Teams

Sports Mall-Kasteler

2022 USTA Adult 40 & Over · 4.0W PM

24 players · average NTRP 4.09 / UTAH

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule

Flight standings for 4.0W PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.77 estimated across 19 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Amy Hansen
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.21
Casey Pickett
usually #1 Doubles 56%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.16
Amber Jorgensen
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 4.5
4.14
Christine Fotheringham
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.99
Julie Cooley
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.99
Christy Owens
usually #3 Doubles 44%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
3.89
Laura Johnston
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
3.88
Kristi Roggensack
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.85
Tiffany Kasteler
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.81
Teisa Linscott
usually #1 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4
3.78
Susan Koelliker
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.75
JaNae Smith
usually #2 Doubles 58%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Anji DowDell
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4
Heather Paddock
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4
3.73
Sara Pinsoneault
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.69
Dorene Sambado
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.69
Gretchen Soffe
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.61
Regina Johnson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 17% · published
3.61
Jodie Monson
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 17% · published 4
3.40
Natalie Watts
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.39
Lindie Hoggan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.14
Kristel Affleck
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Singles 20% · published 3.5
Natalie Lindquist
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 14% · published
Sherri Finnegan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Susan Koelliker + Christine Fotheringham5063% games+10.8% vs expected
JaNae Smith + Regina Johnson9456% games+10.4% vs expected
Teisa Linscott + Casey Pickett8162% games+9.4% vs expected
Tiffany Kasteler + Kristel Affleck8461% games+7.8% vs expected
Amy Hansen + Julie Cooley8557% games+7.3% vs expected
Heather Paddock + JaNae Smith5558% games+7.2% vs expected
Julie Cooley + Christine Fotheringham25760% games+5.5% vs expected
Tiffany Kasteler + Susan Koelliker311058% games+4.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Amy Hansen
43W–44L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4.5
Casey Pickett
184W–134L career · 9 lines in 2022
6%93%1%
4.21
4.5
Amber Jorgensen
114W–36L career · 4 lines in 2022
11%88%<1%
4.16
4.5
Christine Fotheringham
213W–62L career · 9 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
4.14
Julie Cooley
63W–26L career · 4 lines in 2022
53%47%<1%
3.99
4
Christy Owens
202W–116L career · 9 lines in 2022
<1%53%47%
3.99
Laura Johnston
15W–13L career · 4 lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.89
4
Kristi Roggensack
126W–91L career · 7 lines in 2022
<1%81%19%
3.88
Tiffany Kasteler
166W–104L career · 4 lines in 2022
<1%87%12%
3.85
4
Teisa Linscott
170W–105L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
4
Susan Koelliker
133W–81L career · 5 lines in 2022
1%94%5%
3.78
4
JaNae Smith
221W–188L career · 12 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
3.75
4
Anji DowDell
95W–74L career · 6 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Heather Paddock
121W–95L career · 5 lines in 2022
not enough data
4
Sara Pinsoneault
89W–66L career · 11 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Dorene Sambado
102W–113L career · 5 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Gretchen Soffe
79W–60L career · 6 lines in 2022
7%92%1%
3.69
Regina Johnson
122W–100L career · 6 lines in 2022
19%80%<1%
3.61
4
Jodie Monson
144W–103L career · 6 lines in 2022
21%79%<1%
3.61
Natalie Watts
41W–58L career · 4 lines in 2022
78%22%<1%
3.40
Lindie Hoggan
58W–74L career · 3 lines in 2022
81%19%<1%
3.39
3.5
Kristel Affleck
123W–116L career · 5 lines in 2022
14%86%<1%
3.14
Natalie Lindquist
33W–29L career · 7 lines in 2022
not enough data
Sherri Finnegan
69W–26L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.