Teams

V - Sunset Simply Smashing Tri

2021 SoCal Tri-Level 18 &Over · Ventura - Women 4.0

15 players · average NTRP 3.55 / SO.CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2021-09-29vs V - North Ranch - TRI OG'sLost 01
L#1 DoublesDeanna Romero / SANDI WISE vs Sandy Hutchins / Lori Byer6-4, 0-6, 0-1
2021-09-18Lost 01
L#1 DoublesSANDI WISE / Tracey Ackourey vs Vera Stewart / Karen Saitta6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2021-09-11Lost 01
L#2 DoublesSandra Richardson / Manuela Aschacher vs Summer Galante / Crystal Kallik4-6, 2-6
2021-08-29vs V - Sherwood Triple StarsLost 02
L#1 DoublesWyne Quinn / Yeisy Nielson vs Heather Gudger / Madison Ashton3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesSandra Richardson / Manuela Aschacher vs Laura Leff / Donna Oshatz6-7, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Ventura - Women 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.27 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.19
Elain Cleary
published 4.5
3.73
Tracey Ackourey
published
3.70
Deanna Romero
published 4
3.58
Wyne Quinn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.45
Ina Kim
published 3.5
3.38
SANDI WISE
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.36
Inna Skripnikova
published 3.5
Andrea Pakula
published 3.5
3.14
Ann Francisco
published 3.5
2.88
Dawn Stutzman
published 3
2.74
Manuela Aschacher
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
JANE HUANG
published 3
2.32
Nadia Lucero
published
Sherri Finnegan
published
Yeisy Nielson
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

SANDI WISE + Wyne Quinn7461% gamesnot enough data
Tracey Ackourey + Deanna Romero213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Elain Cleary
3W–3L career · no lines in 2021
8%92%1%
4.19
Tracey Ackourey
5W–1L career · no lines in 2021
4%94%2%
3.73
4
Deanna Romero
3W–13L career · no lines in 2021
6%93%1%
3.70
4
Wyne Quinn
103W–92L career · 1 line in 2021
28%72%<1%
3.58
3.5
Ina Kim
14W–10L career · no lines in 2021
<1%66%34%
3.45
3.5
SANDI WISE
187W–162L career · 2 lines in 2021
<1%83%17%
3.38
3.5
Inna Skripnikova
7W–5L career · no lines in 2021
<1%85%14%
3.36
3.5
Andrea Pakula
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Ann Francisco
9W–16L career · no lines in 2021
14%85%<1%
3.14
3
Dawn Stutzman
2W–7L career · no lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
2.88
3
Manuela Aschacher
40W–67L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%2%
2.74
3
JANE HUANG
3W–7L career · no lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
Nadia Lucero
5W–25L career · no lines in 2021
91%9%<1%
2.32
Sherri Finnegan
69W–26L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Yeisy Nielson
1W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.