Teams

ALedoux/DFricke (Firethorne)

2022 Adult 18 & Over League · 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women

5 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2022-05-03vs AEllis (Jeff Adams)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAmy Ballaban / Allison Ledoux vs Abbey Ellis / Sabina Skolnick6-3, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSheri Noot vs Cameron Devitt0-6, 2-6
2022-04-26vs CMcKiernan/VShannon (Raintree)Lost 02
L#1 SinglesCaroline Lattanzi vs Sara Shelor7-6, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesLinda Napolitano / Sheri Noot vs Angela Thomas / Jenny Carlson1-6, 0-6
2022-04-18vs RJampani (Blakeney)Split 11
W#1 SinglesCaroline Lattanzi vs Radhika Jampani6-1, 6-0
L#2 DoublesRenu Renu Gill / Danielle Fricke vs Shanin Trivanovic / Lindsay Nichols1-6, 2-6
W#1 DoublesAllison Ledoux / Amy Ballaban vs Angela MacMurphy / Amy Witherspoon6-3, 6-3
L#1 SinglesSheri Noot vs Kristen Hilty2-6, 1-6
2022-03-22vs MMcSherry (PCC)Won 10
W#1 SinglesCaroline Lattanzi vs Allison Geoghegan6-2, 6-1
2022-03-21vs LMadonna (Weddington)Won 20
W#1 DoublesKate Wodyka / Caroline Lattanzi vs Laurie Madonna / Kristina Campbell6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesAmy Ballaban vs Nara Gregg6-1, 6-1
2022-03-01vs SKopf (Raintree)Won 30
W#1 DoublesAllison Ledoux / Amy Ballaban vs Chelsea Law / Melissa Orr6-4, 6-4
W#1 SinglesCaroline Lattanzi vs Heather Toye6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSheri Noot / Renu Renu Gill vs Rebecca Plaisance / Sara Kopf6-2, 0-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18 & Over Adult 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.74 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.00
Caroline Lattanzi
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.75
Amy Ballaban
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.75
Renu Renu Gill
published
2.67
Danielle Fricke
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.54
Sheri Noot
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Caroline Lattanzi + Sheri Noot123 matchesnot enough data
Sheri Noot + Renu Renu Gill213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Caroline Lattanzi
55W–39L career · 5 lines in 2022
<1%51%49%
3.00
3
Amy Ballaban
43W–32L career · 4 lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
Renu Renu Gill
7W–7L career · no lines in 2022
3%95%3%
2.75
3
Danielle Fricke
56W–50L career · 1 line in 2022
9%90%1%
2.67
3
Sheri Noot
45W–57L career · 4 lines in 2022
39%61%<1%
2.54

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.