Teams

Wilds/Knoxville

2026 Adult 65 & Over-Knoxville · 3.0 Adult 65 & over Women

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Flight standings1 teams · 3.0 Adult 65 & over Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Wilds/Knoxville000000

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.93 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.20
Debra Chaniott
published 3
3.11
Elaine Vandiver
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.99
Janis Crye
published
2.98
Mary Vineyard
published
2.97
Lila Downs
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.95
Martha Wilds
published
2.84
Andrea Anderson
published 3
2.80
Linda Dayringer
published
2.75
Susan Pappas
published
2.74
Joy Benson
published
Fairy Coleman
published
Judy Penry
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Linda Dayringer + Debra Chaniott5351% games−2.5% vs expected
Lila Downs + Martha Wilds303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Debra Chaniott
10W–6L career · type A · no lines in 2026
<1%8%92%
3.20
Elaine Vandiver
6W–9L career · 4 lines in 2026
22%77%<1%
3.11
Janis Crye
8W–5L career · no lines in 2026
52%48%<1%
2.99
Mary Vineyard
8W–12L career · no lines in 2026
<1%57%43%
2.98
Lila Downs
13W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%59%41%
2.97
Martha Wilds
25W–5L career · no lines in 2026
<1%64%36%
2.95
3
Andrea Anderson
2W–1L career · type A · no lines in 2026
1%87%13%
2.84
Linda Dayringer
11W–5L career · no lines in 2026
1%90%8%
2.80
Susan Pappas
5W–13L career · no lines in 2026
96%4%<1%
2.75
Joy Benson
27W–68L career · no lines in 2026
4%93%3%
2.74
Fairy Coleman
0W–2L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Judy Penry
1W–3L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.