Teams

SHC-Jacobo

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.80 / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2024-03-24vs SAC-Shaffer/KoeberlWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Gaggini / Kelly McDonald vs Anne Larson / Lori Farrell6-2, 6-1
W#1 SinglesBridghid McMonagle vs Heidi Seinige6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesBess Jacobo / Heeseung Kang vs Kimberly Shaffer / Lina Gao6-4, 5-7, 0-1
2024-03-16vs MAC-SinnottWon 21
L#1 DoublesKelly McDonald / Bridghid McMonagle vs Elizabeth Fox / Kelly Letourneau0-6, 1-6
W#1 SinglesMarianne McIntosh vs Jessica Decker6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesHeeseung Kang / Kathleen Greene vs Sarah Fredericks / Sarah Schubert6-0, 6-1
2024-03-01vs N OR-MPRC-Amarga-LeeLost 03
L#1 DoublesAnne Gaggini / Kathleen Greene vs Wei Hua / Janene Clark6-7, 2-6
L#1 SinglesHeeseung Kang vs Heather Dale3-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesBess Jacobo / Marianne McIntosh vs Feifei Chen / June Xiao2-6, 0-6
2024-02-24vs WHRC-DavidsonWon 30
W#1 DoublesJenny Isailovski / Marianne McIntosh vs Elma Blum / Melissa Hinton6-2, 6-0
W#1 SinglesBridghid McMonagle vs Kathryn Buckley6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesAnne Gaggini / Heeseung Kang vs Olga Senashova / Kelly Tudorache7-5, 6-2
2024-02-18vs IRV-Gilbertson/SebastianLost 12
L#1 DoublesAnne Gaggini / Kathleen Greene vs Yasmine Foroud / Erin Zollenkopf3-6, 7-5, 0-1
L#1 SinglesHeeseung Kang vs Andrea Cedfeldt3-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesBess Jacobo / Bridghid McMonagle vs Susan Grabe / Emily Rake6-4, 6-2
2024-02-11vs VTC-Ditgen/LockeLost 12
L#1 DoublesBess Jacobo / Jenny Isailovski vs Bonnie Song / Wendy Chang4-6, 4-6
W#1 SinglesBridghid McMonagle vs Heather Sirr6-1, 6-2
L#2 DoublesKelly McDonald / Anne Gaggini vs Abby Pace / Anna Kim3-6, 2-2
2024-02-04vs MV-GwinWon 30
W#1 DoublesJenny Isailovski / Kelly McDonald vs Jennifer Gwin / Noelle Hamilton6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesHeeseung Kang vs Hailey Straube3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBess Jacobo / Kathleen Greene vs Abby Guttormsen / Missy Kim6-1, 6-1
2024-01-28vs N OR-ET-ShinWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Gaggini / Kelly McDonald vs Elena Walker / Emily James0-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#1 SinglesBridghid McMonagle vs Maisha Swanson6-1, 6-4
L#2 DoublesHeeseung Kang / Kathleen Greene vs Rosemarie Mannino / Emily EchoHawk-Rehrer3-6, 1-6
2024-01-21vs CRRC-KimmelWon 21
W#1 DoublesAnne Gaggini / Bess Jacobo vs Nina Parikh / Erika Anderson6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMarianne McIntosh vs Adelia Narkova6-1
W#2 DoublesHeeseung Kang / Kelly McDonald vs Lauren Kimmel / Dana McNeil6-1, 6-1
2024-01-06vs CRRC-Lamb/MosbruckerLost 12
W#1 DoublesAnne Gaggini / Kathleen Greene vs Cheri Mosbrucker / Julie Poetsch6-1, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJenny Isailovski vs Anca Ilau4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesHeeseung Kang / Bridghid McMonagle vs Chelsea McGraw / Annie Lamb3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.55 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.02
Anne Gaggini
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.66
Bridghid McMonagle
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.53
Marianne McIntosh
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.49
Kelly McDonald
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.31
Kathleen Greene
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.25
Heeseung Kang
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Bess Jacobo
usually #2 Doubles 71%, also #1 Doubles 29% · published 2.5
Jenny Isailovski
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kelly McDonald + Kathleen Greene4252% games+3.7% vs expected
Kelly McDonald + Anne Gaggini314 matchesnot enough data
Kelly McDonald + Bridghid McMonagle224 matchesnot enough data
Bridghid McMonagle + Marianne McIntosh044 matchesnot enough data
Heeseung Kang + Kathleen Greene123 matchesnot enough data
Anne Gaggini + Marianne McIntosh123 matchesnot enough data
Anne Gaggini + Kathleen Greene123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Anne Gaggini
29W–14L career · 8 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.02
3
Bridghid McMonagle
23W–27L career · 7 lines in 2024
11%89%<1%
2.66
3
Marianne McIntosh
19W–29L career · 4 lines in 2024
40%60%<1%
2.53
Kelly McDonald
12W–8L career · 6 lines in 2024
54%46%<1%
2.49
Kathleen Greene
10W–17L career · 6 lines in 2024
92%8%<1%
2.31
2.5
Heeseung Kang
32W–61L career · 9 lines in 2024
0%97%3%
2.25
2.5
Bess Jacobo
30W–59L career · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
Jenny Isailovski
2W–4L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.