Teams

Gontarz

2026 STL Tri-Level 18 & Over · Men 4.0

8 players · average NTRP 4.50 / ST. LOUIS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-07-21vs STL/Bakai-Lesko/High-Tri-LevelLost 01
L#3 DoublesJon Tchen / Jason Jan vs Travis Bakai / Malik Hagens2-6, 0-6
2026-07-14vs STL/Bakai-Lesko/High-Tri-LevelLost 01
L#2 DoublesJon Tchen / Cyrus Mevorach vs Ethan Hinni / Ray Ohara2-6, 2-6
2026-07-07vs STL/Bakai-Lesko/High-Tri-LevelLost 01
L#2 DoublesJon Tchen / Cyrus Mevorach vs Ryan White / Ray Ohara0-6, 2-6
2026-06-30vs STL/Bakai-Lesko/High-Tri-LevelLost 03
L#1 DoublesMichael Carney / Daniel Schneller vs Michael Lesko / Rob White4-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesPaul Gontarz / Cyrus Mevorach vs Ryan White / Ethan Hinni5-7, 2-6
L#3 DoublesJon Tchen / Jason Jan vs Malik Hagens / McKenzie Rawden3-6, 2-6
2026-06-23vs STL/Bakai-Lesko/High-Tri-LevelLost 02
L#2 DoublesCyrus Mevorach / Daniel Schneller vs McKenzie Rawden / Ethan Hinni4-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesJason Jan / Jon Tchen vs Travis Bakai / Malik Hagens6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2026-06-16vs STL/Bakai-Lesko/High-Tri-LevelLost 02
L#1 DoublesMichael Carney / Cyrus Mevorach vs Tyler Raclin / Michael Lesko1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJon Tchen / Richard McQueen vs Malik Hagens / Charles Welton2-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Men 4.0
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1STL/Bakai-Lesko/High-Tri-Level60180264
2Gontarz0601836215

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.81 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.21
Cyrus Mevorach
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.13
Daniel Schneller
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
3.90
Paul Gontarz
usually #1 Doubles 78%, also #2 Doubles 22% · published
3.74
Richard McQueen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Jon Tchen
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.58
Jason Jan
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Shawn Khosla
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Michael Carney
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Paul Gontarz + Shawn Khosla14845% games−0.8% vs expected
Cyrus Mevorach + Daniel Schneller3253% games−2.8% vs expected
Jon Tchen + Jason Jan044 matchesnot enough data
Paul Gontarz + Jon Tchen123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Cyrus Mevorach
28W–10L career · 5 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
4.21
4.5
Daniel Schneller
81W–52L career · 5 lines in 2026
18%81%<1%
4.13
Paul Gontarz
188W–115L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.90
Richard McQueen
42W–49L career · 1 line in 2026
4%92%3%
3.74
Jon Tchen
42W–130L career · 6 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Jason Jan
30W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
27%73%<1%
3.58
Shawn Khosla
50W–50L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%51%49%
3.50
Michael Carney
26W–20L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.