Teams

Brown

2026 IA 18 & Over Adult Mixed League · 7.0 X'd 18 Over

13 players · average NTRP 3.75 / IOWA

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-01-09vs GarnerWon 30
W#1 DoublesTim Carstensen / Suzi Carstensen vs Lesley Vancura / Steven Odegaard6-3, 6-3
W#2 DoublesAmy Link / Joe Link vs Rochelle Davis / Marcus Womersley6-2, 6-3
W#3 DoublesPatrick Cosgrove / Jodi Cobb vs Amara Andrews / Michael Damisch3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-11-23vs IA/Rath/18&Over7.0XLost 12
L#1 DoublesJoe Link / Amy Link vs Jennifer Kemmerer / Charles Errington3-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesJodi Cobb / Patrick Cosgrove vs Dominick Rath / Erin Langdon0-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesSuzi Carstensen / Tom Randall vs Logan Storto / Lindy Christensen6-3, 6-2
2025-11-16vs RossWon 21
W#1 DoublesTim Carstensen / Suzi Carstensen vs Ryan Sundermann / Andrea Heffernan7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesKyle Suther / Holly Ervin vs Bopha Chrea / Rolando Sanchez6-1, 6-4
L#3 DoublesKristen Trovas / Tom Randall vs Jake Thomsen / Elisha Horsfall6-4, 3-6, 0-1
2025-11-09vs Patten/WastaWon 30
W#1 DoublesTim Carstensen / Suzi Carstensen vs Samuel Patten / Cait Klenk7-6, 6-4
W#2 DoublesGreg Ervin / Holly Ervin vs Karen Thinnes / Daryl Patten6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnn Brown / Muhannad Abu Nameh vs Carrie Corbett / Peter Eddington6-4, 6-3
2025-10-26vs SteckelWon 30
W#1 DoublesDebra Callahan / Kyle Suther vs Kelly Drake / Mark Steckel6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAmy Link / Joe Link vs Patricia Conrad / Daniel Huff7-5, 6-2
W#3 DoublesPatrick Cosgrove / Jodi Cobb vs Ben Barreras / Michelle Novak6-0, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 7.0 X'd 18 Over have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Kyle Suther
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.59
Amy Link
usually #3 Doubles 43%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published 4
3.52
Suzi Carstensen
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.44
Tim Carstensen
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.24
Patrick Cosgrove
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.14
Debra Callahan
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.12
Tom Randall
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.06
Greg Ervin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.02
Kristen Trovas
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.01
Jodi Cobb
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.92
Muhannad Abu Nameh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.80
Joe Link
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Holly Ervin
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Amy Link + Joe Link10358% games+13.8% vs expected
Patrick Cosgrove + Jodi Cobb5251% games+3.9% vs expected
Suzi Carstensen + Tim Carstensen4252% games−6.3% vs expected
Kristen Trovas + Tim Carstensen5260% gamesnot enough data
Suzi Carstensen + Tom Randall404 matchesnot enough data
Debra Callahan + Kyle Suther303 matchesnot enough data
Holly Ervin + Greg Ervin213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Kyle Suther
11W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%92%6%
3.79
4
Amy Link
35W–28L career · 7 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
3.59
Suzi Carstensen
28W–32L career · 4 lines in 2026
43%57%<1%
3.52
Tim Carstensen
51W–44L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
3.44
Patrick Cosgrove
30W–40L career · 3 lines in 2026
4%92%3%
3.24
3.5
Debra Callahan
19W–4L career · 1 line in 2026
16%84%1%
3.14
Tom Randall
27W–59L career · 2 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
3.12
Greg Ervin
13W–22L career · 1 line in 2026
34%66%<1%
3.06
Kristen Trovas
24W–25L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%44%56%
3.02
Jodi Cobb
29W–18L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%47%53%
3.01
Muhannad Abu Nameh
10W–17L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%71%29%
2.92
Joe Link
16W–4L career · 3 lines in 2026
2%91%7%
2.80
Holly Ervin
6W–4L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.