Teams

Longshore Lake / Beck

2025 Collier Adult 40 & Over Spring · 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule1 played
2025-05-14vs The Strand / RoggeWon 40
W#1 DoublesSUE BECK / Natalia Zeman vs Susan Rogge / Bridget Leopold6-1, 6-2
W#1 SinglesHeidi McGregor vs Sara Anderson6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesAlexandrina Covato / Michelle Bammel vs Katherine MacWilliams / Cindy Simonovich6-2, 4-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMargaret Laggis / Teal Aroy vs Nancy Golya / Barbara Verica7-5, 6-4
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 40 & Over Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.29 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.58
SUE BECK
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.57
Natalia Zeman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.42
Heidi McGregor
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.37
Mara Mazza
published
3.36
Alexandrina Covato
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Daniela de Pietto
published 3.5
3.21
Margaret Laggis
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.19
Kelly Shippy
published
3.15
Magdalene Talford
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.07
Iuliana Boiniceanu
published
2.98
Teal Aroy
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Daniela de Pietto + Natalia Zeman7162% games+11.3% vs expected
SUE BECK + Natalia Zeman6072% gamesnot enough data
Mara Mazza + SUE BECK5064% gamesnot enough data
Mara Mazza + Natalia Zeman224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

SUE BECK
37W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%28%72%
3.58
Natalia Zeman
45W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%32%68%
3.57
Heidi McGregor
10W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Mara Mazza
25W–16L career · no lines in 2025
<1%82%18%
3.37
3.5
Alexandrina Covato
23W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
1%84%15%
3.36
3.5
Daniela de Pietto
23W–13L career · no lines in 2025
3%92%4%
3.26
Margaret Laggis
20W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
7%91%2%
3.21
Kelly Shippy
26W–14L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.19
Magdalene Talford
22W–14L career · 3 lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.15
Iuliana Boiniceanu
2W–1L career · no lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.07
Teal Aroy
9W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
2.98

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.