Teams

Estess/18/2.5/MC/BTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Southern Combo 18 & Over - Men · 2.5 Shrev

12 players · average NTRP 2.75 / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-09-23vs Henderson/18/2.5/MC/POTCWon 21
W#1 DoublesCraig McCloud / Patrick Hannon vs Tyler Comeaux / Myles Roberts3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesZachary Shadinger / Brodie Romero vs Marshall Haynie / Bobby Horne6-3, 6-4
L#3 DoublesCurtis Guillot / Zeb Lee vs David Watters / Patrick Henderson4-6, 6-4, 0-1
2025-09-19vs Chambers-Henry/18/2.5/MC/CTCWon 20
W#1 DoublesZachary Shadinger / Brandon Chapman vs Jordan Chambers / Hal Henry6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesCurtis Guillot / Travis Estess vs Jae Waggoner / Donald Allen6-0, 6-2
2025-09-04vs Allen/18/2.5/MCN/BTCWon 21
L#1 DoublesCurtis Guillot / John Valdez vs Mark Renfro / Phillip Haley2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesMike Moore / Josh Burton vs Kevin Allen / Nicholas Phillips6-1, 6-4
W#3 DoublesTravis Estess / Daniel Allen vs Sonny Lopez / John Davis6-1, 7-5
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.59 estimated across 11 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.05
Patrick Hannon
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
2.95
Brodie Romero
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
2.91
Craig McCloud
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.79
Mike Moore
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.74
Matt Hollowell
published
2.67
Jordan Pearson
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
2.62
Zachary Shadinger
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Curtis Guillot
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 2.5
2.24
Travis Estess
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
2.18
Brandon Chapman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 2.5
2.16
Michael McKenzie
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.16
Matthew Reger
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Zachary Shadinger + Jordan Pearson2436% gamesnot enough data
Craig McCloud + Mike Moore3346% gamesnot enough data
Patrick Hannon + Michael McKenzie404 matchesnot enough data
Michael McKenzie + Matthew Reger224 matchesnot enough data
Zachary Shadinger + Mike Moore213 matchesnot enough data
Travis Estess + Curtis Guillot123 matchesnot enough data
Travis Estess + Matt Hollowell213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Patrick Hannon
31W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%37%63%
3.05
3
Brodie Romero
24W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Craig McCloud
41W–48L career · 6 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
2.91
Mike Moore
25W–38L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
2.79
Matt Hollowell
32W–17L career · no lines in 2025
0%5%95%
2.74
Jordan Pearson
10W–27L career · 4 lines in 2025
12%87%1%
2.67
Zachary Shadinger
25W–16L career · 2 lines in 2025
19%81%<1%
2.62
2.5
Curtis Guillot
1W–5L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Travis Estess
13W–32L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%97%3%
2.24
2.5
Brandon Chapman
14W–17L career · 4 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
Michael McKenzie
11W–14L career · 1 line in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16
Matthew Reger
5W–15L career · no lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.16

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.