Teams

BLUE SPRING

2023 Montgomery Combo Flexible Format League · Montgomery Flexible Combo League Spring

8 players · average NTRP 3.00 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Montgomery Flexible Combo League Spring have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.63 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Cynthia Munshell
published 3.5
2.91
Juan Luis Garcia
published
2.73
Justine Handelman
published
2.50
Raymond Barry
published
2.38
Sara Perla
usually #2 Mixed Doubles 50%, also #1 Mixed Doubles 25% · published 2.5
Jeremy Ben-Ami
published
Sandra Rubin
published
Sarah Xiao
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Cynthia Munshell
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Juan Luis Garcia
18W–24L career · no lines in 2023
<1%76%23%
2.91
Justine Handelman
14W–15L career · no lines in 2023
4%94%2%
2.73
Raymond Barry
2W–16L career · no lines in 2023
51%49%<1%
2.50
2.5
Sara Perla
35W–44L career · 8 lines in 2023
0%82%18%
2.38
Jeremy Ben-Ami
2W–1L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sandra Rubin
3W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
Sarah Xiao
4W–0L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.