Teams

PRC RED

2021 USTA ADULT 40 & OVER - DEN · WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER

10 players · average NTRP 3.17 / COLORADO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2021-07-22vs PCC GREENSplit 22
W#1 DoublesLaura Jones / Julie Hernandez vs Joyce Mendes / Caren Redkey7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJane Burnham vs Audrey Hitchings6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesWendy Mathewson / Carrie del Toro vs Yvonne Knapp / Ann Siebert6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFranny Schmidt / Henriette Nash vs Julie Zaveral / Cait Dutcher3-6, 6-4, 0-1
2021-07-15vs CACI REDLost 13
L#1 DoublesLaura Jones / Carrie del Toro vs Heidi Elliott / Beth Zubowicz1-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesJane Burnham vs Karen Eagleton4-6, 7-5, 1-0
L#2 DoublesKelly Glenn / Julie Hernandez vs Melinda Conover / Kristen Arsenault6-1, 4-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesLinda Manassee Buell / Lisa Rosen vs Lisa Mullett / Margaret Ewald1-6, 3-6
2021-07-08vs PCRK REDSplit 22
L#1 DoublesCynthia Glasier / Jane Burnham vs Kathi Harr / Kathryn Ague4-5
L#1 SinglesJulie Hernandez vs Gina Roth2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesWendy Mathewson / Leslie Hathaway vs Barbara Weis / Belinda Halfmann7-6, 6-7, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKelly Glenn / Franny Schmidt vs Michelle Kramm / Judith Nelson6-2, 6-3
2021-07-01vs CPV ORANGEWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Hernandez / Laura Jones vs Stacia Novak / Elizabeth Zeller6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCarrie del Toro / Leslie Hathaway vs Karen Lang / Mary Lostak6-4, 6-0
L#3 DoublesHenriette Nash / Linda Manassee Buell vs Jami Keenan / Elizabeth Jenks2-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-06-24vs KNO REDWon 21
L#1 DoublesCarrie del Toro / Leslie Hathaway vs Elizabeth Zenk / Beth Cooper1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesFranny Schmidt / Kelly Glenn vs Elizabeth Baesman / Kim Haverly6-3, 6-4
W#3 DoublesLinda Manassee Buell / Lisa Rosen vs Jane Webster / Kelly Lownsberry2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2021-06-17vs PRKR REDWon 31
W#1 DoublesCarrie del Toro / Laura Jones vs Sabrina Alvarez / Heather Marks7-6, 6-3
L#1 SinglesKelly Glenn vs Isabella Latak2-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesHenriette Nash / Franny Schmidt vs Barbara Haines / Lana Overton-Peller7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesLinda Manassee Buell / Lisa Rosen vs ANGELA ROCKWOOD / Vera Case6-0, 6-2
2021-06-10vs SSLT BLUESplit 22
W#1 DoublesCynthia Glasier / Jane Burnham vs Marla Roper / Carolyn Becker6-3, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesHenriette Nash vs Stacy Baumer3-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#2 DoublesLaura Jones / Julie Hernandez vs Kathryn Meyer / Diana Zoeller7-6, 6-4
L#3 DoublesLinda Manassee Buell / Lisa Rosen vs Kimberly Parks / Tina Caranna2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WOMEN 3.5 - 40 & OVER have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.51
Julie Hernandez
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published
3.40
Leslie Hathaway
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.25
Wendy Mathewson
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.17
Kelly Glenn
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
3.15
Cynthia Glasier
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.00
Carrie del Toro
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
3.00
Henriette Nash
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
2.89
Linda Manassee Buell
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.74
Franny Schmidt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3
Jane Burnham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Hathaway + Wendy Mathewson14657% games+9.1% vs expected
Julie Hernandez + Leslie Hathaway10360% games+4.1% vs expected
Linda Manassee Buell + Carrie del Toro3343% games+2.9% vs expected
Julie Hernandez + Wendy Mathewson12558% games+1.7% vs expected
Henriette Nash + Linda Manassee Buell61743% games+0.1% vs expected
Franny Schmidt + Carrie del Toro3248% games−0.7% vs expected
Henriette Nash + Kelly Glenn4550% games−0.9% vs expected
Henriette Nash + Franny Schmidt61141% games−1.8% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Hernandez
110W–55L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%48%52%
3.51
Leslie Hathaway
44W–49L career · 3 lines in 2021
<1%78%21%
3.40
3.5
Wendy Mathewson
85W–54L career · 2 lines in 2021
3%95%3%
3.25
Kelly Glenn
49W–36L career · 4 lines in 2021
9%90%1%
3.17
3.5
Cynthia Glasier
37W–47L career · 2 lines in 2021
13%87%<1%
3.15
3
Carrie del Toro
65W–125L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Henriette Nash
68W–128L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%50%50%
3.00
3
Linda Manassee Buell
78W–122L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%81%19%
2.89
3
Franny Schmidt
44W–73L career · 4 lines in 2021
3%94%2%
2.74
Jane Burnham
12W–21L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.