Teams

WNC Qualifying Team

Adult 18 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 18+ Adult Men 5.0 Mon

5 players · average NTRP 4.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2026-05-22vs WNCC Still (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesLiam Baer / David Hartsock vs Cre Still / Niclas Naedele5-8
L#1 SinglesBryce Bernitt vs Calvin Sullivan1-8
L#2 DoublesHayden Leblanc / Julian Stolevski vs William Bayliss / Branson Smith1-8
2026-05-15vs WNCC Still (HRC)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLiam Baer / Joshua Vandegrift vs Cre Still / Branson Smith8-5
L#1 SinglesDavid Hartsock vs Niclas Naedele5-8
L#2 DoublesJulian Stolevski / Hayden Leblanc vs William Bayliss / Alejo Zurmendi1-8
2026-05-08vs WNCC Still (HRC)Lost 03
L#1 DoublesBryce Bernitt / Julian Stolevski vs Cre Still / Calvin Sullivan4-8
L#1 SinglesJoshua Vandegrift vs Alejo Zurmendi3-8
L#2 DoublesLiam Baer / Hayden Leblanc vs William Bayliss / Branson Smith1-8
2026-05-01vs WNCC Still (HRC)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesJoshua Vandegrift / Liam Baer vs Branson Smith / Cre Still8-5
L#1 SinglesBryce Bernitt vs Calvin Sullivan1-8
L#2 DoublesHayden Leblanc / Julian Stolevski vs William Bayliss / Alejo Zurmendi1-8
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 18+ Adult Men 5.0 Mon
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WNC Qualifying Team3063990
2WNCC Mohammed (HRC)03271492

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.33 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.47
Joshua Vandegrift
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
4.36
Julian Stolevski
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
4.35
Hayden Leblanc
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
4.27
David Hartsock
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 4.5
4.19
Bryce Bernitt
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Hayden Leblanc + Julian Stolevski033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Joshua Vandegrift
4W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.47
Julian Stolevski
1W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.36
Hayden Leblanc
0W–6L career · 4 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.35
4.5
David Hartsock
18W–8L career · 10 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
4.5
Bryce Bernitt
9W–14L career · 6 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
4.19

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.