Teams

Trifecta

2023 Tri-Level League · Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0

14 players · average NTRP 3.60 / TEXAS

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Women 4.0, 3.5, 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.04
Linda Apostalo
published
3.96
Samantha Kadish
published
3.87
Kristi Schaeper
published
3.81
Leigha Cochran
published 4
3.63
Allison Garcia
published 3.5
3.61
3.54
3.29
Stacy Berry
published
3.28
Noemi Copeland
published
Ginger Cook
published 3.5
3.21
Laura Ogrodnik
published
Amy Payne
published 3
Melinda Kasper
published
Rebecca Rios
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Melinda Kasper + Noemi Copeland4451% games+0.3% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Linda Apostalo
116W–71L career · no lines in 2022
38%62%<1%
4.04
Samantha Kadish
13W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%64%36%
3.96
Kristi Schaeper
6W–0L career · no lines in 2022
<1%85%15%
3.87
4
Leigha Cochran
44W–58L career · no lines in 2022
1%92%8%
3.81
3.5
Allison Garcia
41W–7L career · no lines in 2022
<1%16%84%
3.63
4
Bonnie Schweinsberg
3W–12L career · no lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.61
Paula Aguilar Carranca
36W–8L career · no lines in 2022
<1%37%63%
3.54
Stacy Berry
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
1%93%5%
3.29
Noemi Copeland
60W–63L career · no lines in 2022
2%94%5%
3.28
3.5
Ginger Cook
1W–4L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Laura Ogrodnik
5W–6L career · no lines in 2022
5%93%1%
3.21
3
Amy Payne
1W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Melinda Kasper
26W–21L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Rebecca Rios
4W–0L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.