Teams

La Cumbre-Spinners

Adult 40 & Over - SB Winter · SB - Women - 3.0

7 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2026-03-22vs SBTC-Aperol AcesWon 10
W#1 DoublesLindsay Pellegrino / Leslie Schneiderman vs Jill Byron-Salzman / Brenda Dentinger6-1, 6-3
2026-03-15vs SB LLWx-Rally GirlsLost 02
L#1 DoublesLeslie Schneiderman / Elisabeth Zahm vs Julie Hirsch / Denise Sordyl6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesChristy Janka / Monica Kaderali vs Nicole de la Cruz / Susan Bender2-6, 2-6
2026-03-01vs SBTC-Aperol AcesWon 30
W#1 DoublesLeslie Schneiderman / Angela Moloney vs Erin Shaffer / Susan Dunton6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesChristy Janka / Elisabeth Zahm vs Stephanie Do / Namita Patel6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesEunju Yoo / Lindsay Pellegrino vs Brenda Dentinger / Elizabeth Heron3-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-02-22vs SB LLWx-Rally GirlsLost 01
L#1 DoublesJennifer Kramer / Christy Janka vs Jane Van Brussel / Usha DeMatteo2-6, 6-7
2026-01-25vs SBTC-Aperol AcesWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeslie Schneiderman / Jane Nicolais vs Renee Houston / Darcie Burk7-5, 7-5
W#2 DoublesMonica Kaderali / Christy Janka vs Namita Patel / Lilia Hine6-4, 7-6
2026-01-14vs SB LLWx-Rally GirlsSplit 11
L#1 DoublesLeslie Schneiderman / Christy Janka vs Jane Van Brussel / Denise Sordyl0-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesJane Nicolais / Monica Kaderali vs Susan Bender / Tara Fooks6-2, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SB - Women - 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.95 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.59
Lindsay Pellegrino
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.99
Jane Nicolais
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.94
Angela Moloney
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.88
Monica Kaderali
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.65
Leslie Schneiderman
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Christy Janka
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3
Nadine Gilles
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Christy Janka + Monica Kaderali134 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lindsay Pellegrino
11W–8L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%<1%>99%
3.59
Jane Nicolais
18W–21L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%54%46%
2.99
3
Angela Moloney
3W–13L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%65%35%
2.94
Monica Kaderali
4W–5L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
Leslie Schneiderman
12W–9L career · 5 lines in 2026
15%85%1%
2.65
3
Christy Janka
8W–13L career · 5 lines in 2026
17%82%<1%
2.63
Nadine Gilles
1W–1L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.