Teams

SDNC 4.0 Lomas Santa Fe/ Seidel (2/2)

2021 Adult 40 & Over Summer- SDNC · SDNC - Women - 4.0

10 players · average NTRP 3.75 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
L#1 DoublesLisa Michaels / Nancy Turock vs Lori Merino / Katherine Thompson0-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesPhaeddra Seidel / Ruth Tumini vs Becky Ness / Kristen Kennedy1-6, 7-5, 0-1
2021-07-02vs SDNC 4.0 Morgan Run/ Adams (2/2)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesCarey Cimino / Nancy Turock vs Jennifer FIelds / Sarah Miller1-6, 0-6
L#1 DoublesNancy Turock / Ruth Tumini vs Kellie Doyle / Tory Hill3-6, 4-6
2021-06-11vs SDNC 4.0 RBCTC/ Fisher (2/2)Lost 02
L#1 DoublesRuth Tumini / Janet Hoover vs Rene Carmichael / Margaret Hudson1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRobyn Kay / Nancy Turock vs Michall Saccuzzo / TERESA FISHER2-6, 2-6
2021-06-04vs SDNC 4.0 RPTC/ Lemker (2/2)Lost 01
L#1 DoublesRuth Tumini / Carey Cimino vs Tatiana Vaschenko / Deborah Parks4-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women - 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.32 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Carey Cimino
published 4
3.55
Janet Hoover
published
3.51
Nancy Turock
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.39
Ruth Tumini
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.32
Lisa Michaels
published
3.23
Vicki Fitzgerald
published
3.16
3.05
Septembre Flannery
published
Jennifer Benshoof
published
Karen Kaseno
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Nancy Turock + Lisa Michaels5449% games+1.5% vs expected
Nancy Turock + Ruth Tumini044 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Carey Cimino
0W–1L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Janet Hoover
3W–11L career · no lines in 2021
34%66%<1%
3.55
3.5
Nancy Turock
47W–52L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%47%53%
3.51
4
Ruth Tumini
47W–79L career · 4 lines in 2021
79%21%<1%
3.39
Lisa Michaels
8W–7L career · no lines in 2021
1%91%8%
3.32
Vicki Fitzgerald
0W–6L career · no lines in 2021
98%2%<1%
3.23
3.5
Catherine Garcia Barry
1W–3L career · no lines in 2021
10%89%<1%
3.16
Septembre Flannery
3W–5L career · no lines in 2021
36%64%<1%
3.05
Jennifer Benshoof
1W–0L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data
Karen Kaseno
5W–16L career · no lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.