Teams

Todd/18/2.5/WN/BSC

2025 LAF Adult 18 & Over - Women Night · 2.5 LAF (18&O) Women Night

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / LOUISIANA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-03-25vs Alberton/18/2.5/WN/OCCSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMollee Helmick / Kate Chaisson vs Allie Vermaelen / Amelie Abshire6-3, 6-1
L#1 SinglesShelby Breaux vs Aftan Guidry6-3, 2-6, 0-1
2025-03-18vs Massel/18/2.5/WN/BSCLost 12
W#1 DoublesSavannah Puissegur / Kellie Meche vs Ashleigh Landry / Sharon Leonards6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesAlexis Dover vs Jamie Broussard0-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKacy Todd / Shelby Breaux vs Cori Fontenot / Danielle Reggio7-6, 3-6, 0-1
2025-03-11vs Dupre/2.5/18/BEVRLost 03
L#1 DoublesKacy Todd / Kate Chaisson vs Marguerita Archangel / Elizabeth Miller1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesKellie Meche vs Claire Roy0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesShelby Breaux / Alexis Dover vs Aleisha Lacour / Shannon Nolan1-6, 0-6
2025-02-25vs Dade/18/2.5/WN/YSCWon 20
W#1 DoublesSavannah Puissegur / Kellie Meche vs Anya Robin / Danielle Strong6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKate Chaisson / Kacy Todd vs Katy Coffelt / Amelia Reaves7-5, 6-4
2025-02-04vs Patin/18/2.5/WN/BSCLost 02
L#1 DoublesKacy Todd / Kellie Meche vs Cassie Plauche / Kelly Jacobs2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 DoublesShelby Breaux / Mollee Helmick vs Priscilla Spain / Demi Bourque3-6, 6-4, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 2.5 LAF (18&O) Women Night have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.31 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.59
Lauren Kessler
published
2.54
Kate Chaisson
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.45
Savannah Puissegur
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.18
Shelby Breaux
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
1.78
Alexis Dover
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Kacy Todd
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Kellie Meche
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Mollee Helmick
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Kacy Todd + Kate Chaisson3251% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Lauren Kessler
7W–10L career · no lines in 2025
25%75%<1%
2.59
Kate Chaisson
15W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%39%61%
2.54
Savannah Puissegur
5W–6L career · 2 lines in 2025
66%34%<1%
2.45
Shelby Breaux
3W–18L career · 4 lines in 2025
99%1%<1%
2.18
2.5
Alexis Dover
0W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.78
Kacy Todd
3W–7L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kellie Meche
2W–2L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
Mollee Helmick
1W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.