Teams

Mid-Atlantic/Baumann/55&Over9.0W

2024 Montgomery Adult 55 & Over · Montgomery Adult 55 & Over 9.0 Women

17 players · average NTRP 4.50 / MARYLAND

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-07-23vs CarvajalWon 20
W#1 DoublesCheryl Driscoll / Carol Besse vs Ronda Estridge / Aileen Jones6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesMary Olson / Allison Lebo vs N/A6-0, 6-0
2024-06-30vs CarvajalLost 01
L#2 DoublesCarol Besse / Pamela Dean vs Kelly Domson / Ronda Estridge2-6, 3-6
2024-05-29vs CarvajalLost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Lebo / Laura Smith vs Anne Jagodits / Teresa Nyberg-Grim2-6, 6-3, 0-1
2024-05-22vs CarvajalLost 01
L#3 DoublesCarol Besse / Pamela Dean vs Nancy Colleton / Aileen Jones6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2024-05-19vs CarvajalWon 10
W#3 DoublesAllison Lebo / Jane Simoni vs Nancy Colleton / Vanessa Ogilvie6-2, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Montgomery Adult 55 & Over 9.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.12 estimated across 14 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Delphine Owen
published 5
4.31
Karina Walters
published 4.5
4.30
Dava Baumann
published 4.5
4.25
Kathryn Rigney
published
Cheryl Driscoll
published 4.5
4.24
Jane Simoni
published 4.5
4.18
Helen Shepherd
published
4.16
Loretta Sevier
published
4.15
Mary Ann Wagner
published
4.14
Michele Davis
published
4.10
Pamela Dean
published
4.10
Jennifer Collier
published
4.10
Allison Lebo
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.06
Carol Besse
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
3.90
Kim Miller
published
3.67
Anita Wilson
published 4
Laura Smith
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jane Simoni + Karina Walters16457% games+1.2% vs expected
Carol Besse + Pamela Dean5451% games+1.1% vs expected
Michele Davis + Kathryn Rigney213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Delphine Owen
7W–1L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Karina Walters
29W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%8%
4.31
4.5
Dava Baumann
33W–25L career · type A · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
Kathryn Rigney
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
3%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Cheryl Driscoll
5W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Jane Simoni
45W–21L career · no lines in 2024
4%92%3%
4.24
Helen Shepherd
26W–17L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
4.18
Loretta Sevier
20W–10L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
4.16
Mary Ann Wagner
15W–14L career · no lines in 2024
15%85%1%
4.15
Michele Davis
28W–24L career · no lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
4.14
Pamela Dean
40W–38L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
4.10
Jennifer Collier
10W–4L career · no lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Allison Lebo
22W–19L career · 3 lines in 2024
24%76%<1%
4.10
4.5
Carol Besse
288W–186L career · 3 lines in 2024
32%68%<1%
4.06
Kim Miller
42W–15L career · no lines in 2024
<1%75%24%
3.90
4
Anita Wilson
32W–41L career · no lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.67
Laura Smith
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.