Teams

7 SCC Happy Hitters - Percy

2025 Richmond Singles · Richmond Singles 2.5 Women

8 players · average NTRP 2.50 / VIRGINIA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2025-11-03vs 5 Westwood GeeLost 12
L#1 SinglesMichelle Foley vs Michelle Christian5-7, 2-6
L#2 SinglesLeslie Percy vs Ashley Allen6-7, 3-6
W#3 SinglesAllison Moore vs Kelly Noack3-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-10-20vs 4 Ridgetop Pugh SinglesWon 21
L#1 SinglesMichelle Foley vs Grayson Honeycutt1-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 SinglesKristen Hensel vs Lauren Timms6-2, 6-1
W#3 SinglesAbby Getzel vs Nicole Pugh6-3, 1-6, 1-0
2025-10-13vs 15 Stonehenge ZambitoLost 12
W#1 SinglesLeslie Percy vs Katisha Kersey6-7, 6-1, 1-0
L#2 SinglesDorothy Stratton vs Aimie Gindi4-6, 6-0, 0-1
L#3 SinglesRegina Dilauro Fay vs Amanda Skipper0-1
2025-10-06vs 13 Magnolia Green SheldonLost 12
L#1 SinglesAllison Moore vs Jennifer Conrad0-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesLeslie Percy vs Sarah Bishop6-0, 6-0
L#3 SinglesRegina Dilauro Fay vs Lauren Ricci4-6, 2-6
2025-10-05vs 11 ACAC Routree/EaveyLost 03
L#1 SinglesKristen Hensel vs Cynthia Iracane2-6, 0-6
L#2 SinglesAbby Getzel vs Eun Lee6-7, 0-6
L#3 SinglesRegina Dilauro Fay vs Lisa Rountree0-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesLeslie Percy vs Melissa Lloyd0-6, 3-6
L#2 SinglesDorothy Stratton vs Julie Sprinkle1-6, 4-6
L#3 SinglesAbby Getzel vs Elizabeth Whiteside0-6, 3-6
2025-09-22vs 9 Rockwood Cove Ladies - MooreWon 30
W#1 SinglesMichelle Foley vs Joslyn Wolberg6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesLeslie Percy vs Amy Cross6-4, 7-5
W#3 SinglesKristen Hensel vs Emily Ashton6-0, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Richmond Singles 2.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.12 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.58
Michelle Foley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.20
Becca Nagle
published 2.5
2.18
Dorothy Stratton
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
2.14
Allison Moore
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #3 Singles 50% · published 2.5
2.09
Leslie Percy
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #1 Singles 40% · published
2.04
Kristen Hensel
usually #3 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
1.94
Regina Dilauro Fay
usually #3 Singles 100% · published
1.78
Abby Getzel
usually #3 Singles 67%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 2.5
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Becca Nagle + Dorothy Stratton033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Michelle Foley
15W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
27%73%<1%
2.58
2.5
Becca Nagle
8W–13L career · no lines in 2025
0%98%2%
2.20
Dorothy Stratton
4W–22L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.18
2.5
Allison Moore
12W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
0%99%1%
2.14
Leslie Percy
9W–27L career · 5 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.09
Kristen Hensel
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
2.04
Regina Dilauro Fay
3W–6L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.94
2.5
Abby Getzel
4W–10L career · 3 lines in 2025
0%>99%<1%
1.78

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.