Teams

WI/Hammond/55&Over7.0M

2024 WI Adult 55 & Over · WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
W#1 DoublesKevin Struck / Jacques Verbauwhede vs Jay Kassel / Steve Callahan6-0, 6-2
W#2 DoublesTodd Hammond / Clay Sewell vs Charles Dahlke / Haydar Saleh6-1, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 DoublesKevin Struck / Jacques Verbauwhede vs Steve Callahan / Jay Kassel6-2, 6-3
W#2 DoublesTodd Hammond / Patrick Connor vs Jonathan Paque / Charles Dahlke3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRichard Gerstein / Robert Prehn vs Michael Brandfon / Haydar Saleh6-2, 6-0
W#1 DoublesJacques Verbauwhede / Kevin Struck vs Jay Kassel / Jonathan Paque6-1, 6-0
W#2 DoublesDavid Gahagan / Richard Gerstein vs Charles Dahlke / Steve Callahan5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatrick Connor / Robert Prehn vs Haydar Saleh / Michael Brandfon6-1, 6-2
W#1 DoublesRichard Gerstein / David Gahagan vs Charles Dahlke / Mark Putzier6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesPatrick Connor / Clay Sewell vs Jay Kassel / Michael Brandfon7-5, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1WI/Hammond/55&Over7.0M40111563
2WI Adult 55&O 3.5M NEL Appleton Paque0411122131

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.37 estimated across 5 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.79
Jacques Verbauwhede
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.40
Robert Prehn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.32
David Gahagan
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
Clay Sewell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.21
Todd Hammond
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.17
Kevin Struck
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Richard Gerstein
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

David Gahagan + Todd Hammond2353% gamesnot enough data
Jacques Verbauwhede + Kevin Struck303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jacques Verbauwhede
69W–45L career · 3 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.79
Robert Prehn
10W–6L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%77%23%
3.40
3.5
David Gahagan
35W–19L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%89%9%
3.32
3.5
Clay Sewell
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Todd Hammond
27W–34L career · 2 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
3.21
Kevin Struck
22W–21L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
3.17
Richard Gerstein
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.