Teams

Bailey, Ben

2025 Tri-Level 18 & Over-JXN · Men 3.0, 3.5, 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 3.50 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2025-08-19vs Sims, JTLost 12
L#1 DoublesWill Mosby / Chandler Strain vs Daniel Phyfer / Niven Walker1-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesCharles Bailey / David Adams vs Jonathan Sims / Bryce Ishee6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesElliott Ainsworth / Stephen Baldwyn vs Blair Williamson / Brandon Norton1-6, 1-1
2025-06-12vs McIntyre, TylerWon 30
W#1 DoublesChandler Strain / Will Mosby vs Tyler Mcintyre / Blake Kennedy6-0, 6-3
W#2 DoublesCharles Bailey / David Adams vs Stan Fisher / Matthew Roland7-5, 6-3
W#3 DoublesAlex Hawkins / Stephen Baldwyn vs Reece Welch / Robbie Holt6-2, 6-4
2025-05-22vs Wilson, RobertWon 30
W#1 DoublesChandler Strain / Stephen Langley vs Dario Rosa / Tim Mask3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCooper Tyner / David Adams vs Foster Jordan / Travis Donald4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesAlex Hawkins / Philip Cothern vs Robert Wilson / Louis Saddler6-2, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0, 3.5, 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.19 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.57
Chandler Strain
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.33
Joseph Hull
published
3.31
Travis Finseth
published
Cooper Tyner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.20
Beau Brady
published 3.5
3.11
Stephen Langley
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.09
Stephen Baldwyn
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.05
Charles Bailey
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
2.88
Philip Cothern
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Alex Hawkins
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Elliott Ainsworth
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Will Mosby
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Charles Bailey + Joseph Hull3251% gamesnot enough data
Charles Bailey + Beau Brady404 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Chandler Strain
37W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
30%70%<1%
3.57
Joseph Hull
19W–10L career · no lines in 2025
1%88%11%
3.33
Travis Finseth
15W–11L career · no lines in 2025
<1%1%99%
3.31
3.5
Cooper Tyner
9W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Beau Brady
17W–8L career · no lines in 2025
8%90%1%
3.20
Stephen Langley
14W–16L career · 1 line in 2025
>99%<1%<1%
3.11
Stephen Baldwyn
35W–18L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%25%75%
3.09
3.5
Charles Bailey
42W–27L career · 2 lines in 2025
37%63%<1%
3.05
Philip Cothern
28W–32L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%80%19%
2.88
3
Alex Hawkins
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Elliott Ainsworth
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data
Will Mosby
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.