Teams

TPC 2

2024 SUMMER Tri Level · Summer Tri Level Women

14 players · average NTRP 4.40 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-08-24vs TPC 1Split 11
L#1 DoublesJulia Huffman / Alexandra Lerg vs Jennifer Hirsh / Ellyn Spagna3-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesCara O'Connor / Julie Samora vs Kyra Wagner / Christy Abdella6-4, 6-3
2024-08-20vs TPC 1Lost 03
L#1 DoublesMaria Zivick / Tara Hayes vs Kelly Douple / Jennifer Hirsh6-7, 7-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCara O'Connor / Tess Tannehill vs Ellyn Spagna / Jenamarie DuBois5-7, 6-7
L#3 DoublesJudy Barbao / Chelsea Rubin vs Kyra Wagner / Jena Gruenebaum1-6, 2-6
2024-08-17vs TPC 1Split 11
L#1 DoublesJulia Huffman / Anne Zivick vs Mara Sheley / Kelly Douple4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Samora / Colleen Baker vs Jena Gruenebaum / Kyra Wagner6-2, 6-4
2024-08-13vs TPC 1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMaria Zivick / Megan Schembechler vs Mara Sheley / Mandy Marchant4-6, 6-2, 0-1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Jarrett / Tess Tannehill vs Rebecca Spears Hinze / My Linh Li4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesKris Susa / Judy Barbao vs Tammy Smith / Stacey Royer6-2, 6-3
2024-08-03vs TPC 1Lost 12
L#1 DoublesMichelle Jarrett / Megan Schembechler vs Mara Sheley / Mandy Marchant1-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesMaria Zivick / Julia Huffman vs My Linh Li / Rebecca Spears Hinze6-7, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJulie Samora / Colleen Baker vs Jena Gruenebaum / Christy Abdella7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · Summer Tri Level Women
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1TPC 14110512128
2TPC 21451020148

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.08 estimated across 10 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.62
Megan Schembechler
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Colleen Baker
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.21
Maria Zivick
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
4.19
Anne Zivick
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.14
Cara O'Connor
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.12
Michelle Jarrett
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.11
Alexandra Lerg
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.04
Tara Hayes
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Kris Susa
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.80
Judy Barbao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Chelsea Rubin
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.74
Julie Samora
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Julia Huffman
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Tess Tannehill
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Judy Barbao + Julie Samora4258% games+7.7% vs expected
Kris Susa + Judy Barbao1083658% games+3.7% vs expected
Maria Zivick + Anne Zivick8357% games−2.4% vs expected
Kris Susa + Cara O'Connor3259% gamesnot enough data
Kris Susa + Julie Samora303 matchesnot enough data
Julie Samora + Cara O'Connor303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Megan Schembechler
17W–4L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%20%80%
4.62
4.5
Colleen Baker
11W–12L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Zivick
30W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
7%91%2%
4.21
4.5
Anne Zivick
24W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
9%90%1%
4.19
4.5
Cara O'Connor
198W–27L career · type D · 2 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
4.14
Michelle Jarrett
61W–38L career · 2 lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
4.12
4.5
Alexandra Lerg
66W–41L career · 1 line in 2024
22%78%<1%
4.11
Tara Hayes
60W–54L career · 1 line in 2024
39%61%<1%
4.04
Kris Susa
268W–135L career · 1 line in 2024
1%88%11%
3.83
Judy Barbao
185W–84L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
4
Chelsea Rubin
10W–14L career · 1 line in 2024
not enough data
Julie Samora
135W–82L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%4%96%
3.74
Julia Huffman
26W–14L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Tess Tannehill
51W–32L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.