Teams

ATC WATKINS

2026 FW Adult 18 & Over League - Men · Saturday 3.0 Men

12 players · average NTRP 3.00 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-19vs RTC BIGBYSplit 22
W#1 DoublesChad Engelsman / Timothy Wiggins vs Adrian Redd / Brent Korte6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesJackson Locke vs Leopoldo Cardiel Martinez5-7, 6-7
L#2 DoublesScott Rolf / Cooper Tye vs Russell Brewster / James Triplett2-6, 6-7
W#3 DoublesSean Lin / Michael Fishbein vs Darrell Dreith / Tim Hawkins6-4, 7-5
2026-05-09vs RTC SMILEYLost 04
L#1 DoublesSean Lin / Shrijan Mashal vs Jose Gonzalez / Shannon Cruse0-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 DoublesTimothy Wiggins / Ray Watkins vs Christopher DeFraites / Josh Frenzel1-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#2 SinglesOliver Bell vs Vincent Sandoval1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesMichael Fishbein / Christian Moreno vs Austin Aurelio / Sam Joiner1-6, 4-6
2026-05-02vs RID FATELost 14
W#1 DoublesChad Engelsman / Scott Rolf vs Harrison Helton / Anthony Diaz6-4, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJackson Locke vs Michael Quiroz6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesAnjeev Nepali / Sean Lin vs Roy Gillespie / Ryan Craft2-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#2 SinglesOliver Bell vs James Romaine1-6, 2-6
L#3 DoublesChristian Moreno / Rindge Leaphart vs Richard Fate / Jason Edwards7-5, 5-7, 0-1
2026-04-18vs MCL MANONWon 21
W#1 DoublesChad Engelsman / Scott Rolf vs Manuel Rangel / Mohammad Akkad6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesRay Watkins / Timothy Wiggins vs Mitch Basham / Najam Mirza4-6, 4-6
W#3 DoublesOliver Bell / Shrijan Mashal vs Igor Parshin / Subbaramireddy Remala6-4, 6-3
2026-04-11vs RTC BIGBYLost 13
W#1 DoublesTimothy Wiggins / Chad Engelsman vs David Dye / Darrell Dreith6-4, 6-0
L#2 DoublesAnjeev Nepali / Scott Rolf vs Tim Hawkins / Adrian Redd4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#2 SinglesOliver Bell vs Cesar Fuentes1-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesChristian Moreno / Ray Watkins vs Robert Germany / Dean Hinnen3-6, 1-6
2026-04-04vs RTC SMILEYLost 13
L#1 DoublesCooper Tye / Christian Moreno vs Phillip Klumper / Jose Gonzalez1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesTimothy Wiggins / Ray Watkins vs Christopher DeFraites / Kermit Gable3-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesJackson Locke vs Vincent Sandoval1-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesShrijan Mashal / Chad Engelsman vs Josh Frenzel / Edwin Mondragon7-6, 6-2
2026-04-02vs RID FATELost 04
L#1 DoublesTimothy Wiggins / Sean Lin vs Harrison Helton / Jerry Burt1-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesRay Watkins / Anjeev Nepali vs Jason Edwards / Robert Kraut4-6, 4-6
L#2 SinglesJackson Locke vs Clint Harper3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesRindge Leaphart / Oliver Bell vs Reid Boydstun / Ryan Craft1-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Saturday 3.0 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.73 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.06
Scott Rolf
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.90
Oliver Bell
usually #2 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
2.86
Timothy Wiggins
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
2.83
Chad Engelsman
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.80
Michael Fishbein
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.75
Jackson Locke
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
2.71
Shrijan Mashal
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
2.67
Anjeev Nepali
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.59
Ray Watkins
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
2.56
Christian Moreno
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.54
Rindge Leaphart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.52
Cooper Tye
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Timothy Wiggins + Ray Watkins5749% games+2.6% vs expected
Michael Fishbein + Ray Watkins033 matchesnot enough data
Chad Engelsman + Ray Watkins123 matchesnot enough data
Rindge Leaphart + Oliver Bell033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Scott Rolf
3W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%32%68%
3.06
Oliver Bell
3W–8L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%75%25%
2.90
Timothy Wiggins
12W–17L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%83%17%
2.86
3
Chad Engelsman
8W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%87%12%
2.83
Michael Fishbein
3W–9L career · 2 lines in 2026
2%91%8%
2.80
Jackson Locke
2W–8L career · 4 lines in 2026
4%93%4%
2.75
Shrijan Mashal
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
6%92%2%
2.71
3
Anjeev Nepali
2W–5L career · type S · 3 lines in 2026
12%88%1%
2.67
Ray Watkins
7W–27L career · 5 lines in 2026
26%74%<1%
2.59
3
Christian Moreno
0W–4L career · type S · 4 lines in 2026
34%65%<1%
2.56
Rindge Leaphart
6W–25L career · 2 lines in 2026
39%61%<1%
2.54
3
Cooper Tye
0W–4L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
46%54%<1%
2.52

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.