Teams

N OR-SHC-Juppenlatz

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 5.0 Women

4 players · average NTRP 4.88 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 4.45 estimated across 1 rated player. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Allison Buchman
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 5
Sanja Lemes
published 5
Stephanie Paulson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 5
4.45
Erin Link
usually #1 Doubles 83%, also #2 Doubles 17% · published 4.5
Results5 ties
2024-02-18Lost 02
L#1 SinglesStephanie Paulson vs Amina Moreau6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesAllison Buchman / Shannon DeVall vs Sarah Ferrer / Nicole Partch7-5, 7-5
2024-01-27Won 10
W#1 DoublesStephanie Paulson / Katie Kinsfogel vs Christie Post / Tato Zedginidze6-1, 3-6, 1-0
2023-12-10Lost 01
L#1 DoublesAllison Buchman / Paul OHollaren vs Mark Chen / Anna Reutin6-3, 6-2
2023-12-09Won 10
W#1 DoublesJon Griesser / Allison Buchman vs Andrew Pritchard / Kristin Taylor6-3, 2-6, 1-0
2023-12-08Lost 01
L#3 DoublesAllison Buchman / Paul OHollaren vs Sean Wei / Cassia Carpio6-7, 6-1, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

5
Allison Buchman
95W–27L career
not enough data
5
Sanja Lemes
25W–13L career
not enough data
5
Stephanie Paulson
119W–43L career
not enough data
4.5
Erin Link
109W–77L career · type A
0%74%26%
4.45

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.