Teams

Michaelis

2025 Mixed Adult 18 & Over-Chattanooga · 4.0

12 players · average NTRP 4.00 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-07-05vs Poe/ChattanoogaLost 12
W#1 DoublesJulie Briggs / Edis Krnjic vs Aubrie Poe / Patrick Urey6-4, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesJacob Quast / Laura Adams vs Michelle Phillips / Carl Phillips2-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesKyle Christensen / Emily Donohue Speer vs Rommel Ramos / Ana Sanchis2-6, 2-6
2025-06-23vs Poe/ChattanoogaWon 21
W#1 DoublesCaitlin Michaelis / Shazman Ali vs Lauren Perry / Zachary Mngo6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesLaura Adams / Jacob Quast vs Aubrie Poe / Patrick Urey3-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesLaura Ketcham / Bryce Curry vs Michael Rollins / Leland Wheland4-6, 6-2, 1-0
2025-06-16vs Poe/ChattanoogaLost 12
L#1 DoublesShazman Ali / Stacy Sorrow vs Aubrie Poe / Patrick Urey2-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesCaitlin Haskell / Brian Thomas vs Ana Sanchis / Carl Phillips4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#3 DoublesBryce Curry / Emily Donohue Speer vs Michelle Phillips / Zachary Mngo7-6, 3-6, 1-0
2025-06-14vs Poe/ChattanoogaWon 21
W#1 DoublesJulie Briggs / Edis Krnjic vs Aubrie Poe / Michael Rollins4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesCaitlin Haskell / Shazman Ali vs Ana Sanchis / Rommel Ramos6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesCaitlin Michaelis / Bryce Curry vs Michelle Phillips / Patrick Urey2-6, 2-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.61 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.01
Brian Thomas
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.91
Caitlin Michaelis
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4
Caitlin Haskell
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.71
Edis Krnjic
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.67
Laura Ketcham
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.66
Stacy Sorrow
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.50
Shazman Ali
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Bryce Curry
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.35
Julie Briggs
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.29
Jacob Quast
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Emily Donohue Speer
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Kyle Christensen
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Bryce Curry + Laura Ketcham404 matchesnot enough data
Laura Ketcham + Edis Krnjic404 matchesnot enough data
Brian Thomas + Stacy Sorrow033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Brian Thomas
7W–4L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%48%52%
4.01
4
Caitlin Michaelis
18W–7L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%26%
3.91
4
Caitlin Haskell
4W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Edis Krnjic
39W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
7%91%2%
3.71
Laura Ketcham
62W–8L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%<1%>99%
3.67
Stacy Sorrow
42W–25L career · 1 line in 2025
13%86%1%
3.66
Shazman Ali
20W–13L career · 3 lines in 2025
49%51%<1%
3.50
4
Bryce Curry
23W–4L career · 3 lines in 2025
70%30%<1%
3.42
Julie Briggs
19W–9L career · 2 lines in 2025
86%14%<1%
3.35
Jacob Quast
23W–12L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%2%98%
3.29
Emily Donohue Speer
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kyle Christensen
6W–1L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.