Teams

SDNC LLW 6.0 RPTC/ Murphy

2026 SoCal 65 & Over Summer-SD · SDNC

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule2 played
W#1 DoublesIsabel Cooper / Olga Zagnitko vs Janet Bergland / Ladan Monshi7-5, 1-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPat Greenwald / Deborah Brenner vs Marva Gesell / Katrina Peterson0-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesHarriet Gerza / Rita Murphy vs Nancy Back / Susan Schraeder0-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesOlga Zagnitko / Isabel Cooper vs Marva Gesell / Susan Schraeder6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesLiz Perkins / Vicky Young vs Janet Bergland / Nancy Back5-7, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesRita Murphy / Laurie Dietz vs Susan Gammon / Suzi Launey3-6, 7-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.76 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.98
Liz Perkins
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
2.94
Rita Murphy
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.90
Olga Zagnitko
published 3
2.88
Isabel Cooper
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
2.76
Beth Levine
published 3
Deborah Brenner
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Harriet Gerza
published 3
2.55
Janice Eppel
published 3
2.53
Laurie Dietz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.50
Pat Greenwald
published 3
Vicky Young
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Liz Perkins + Rita Murphy7360% games+9.3% vs expected
Olga Zagnitko + Isabel Cooper10456% games+1.0% vs expected
Rita Murphy + Laurie Dietz2539% games−8.9% vs expected
Vicky Young + Liz Perkins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Liz Perkins
16W–10L career · 1 line in 2026
<1%56%44%
2.98
Rita Murphy
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%66%34%
2.94
3
Olga Zagnitko
13W–9L career · no lines in 2026
<1%76%24%
2.90
Isabel Cooper
9W–7L career · 2 lines in 2026
<1%80%20%
2.88
3
Beth Levine
10W–8L career · no lines in 2026
3%93%4%
2.76
3
Deborah Brenner
0W–1L career · type S · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
3
Harriet Gerza
11W–29L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
3
Janice Eppel
8W–28L career · no lines in 2026
37%63%<1%
2.55
Laurie Dietz
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2026
42%58%<1%
2.53
3
Pat Greenwald
29W–84L career · no lines in 2026
49%51%<1%
2.50
Vicky Young
4W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.