Teams

FSSC Klank

2024 OH OV SUMMER Mixed 18&O Dayton · 2024 MXD 18&O 10.0 Dayton

16 players · average NTRP 4.75 / OHIO VALLEY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-08-17Lost 01
L#2 DoublesAudree Mcnichols / Richard Heilman vs Meghan Sorensen / David Peyton7-6, 5-7, 1-0
2024-08-03vs QRRC HawleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesShannon Young / Noah Boyce vs Jeremy Flora / Meghan Sorensen6-4, 2-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPhilip Brumbaugh / Audree Mcnichols vs Alexander Boardman / Lauren Hawley0-6, 3-6
W#3 DoublesColby Sanford / Max Tsao vs Taylor Pritt / Kevin Burr6-2, 1-6, 1-0
2024-07-19vs QRRC HawleySplit 11
W#1 DoublesShannon Young / Cole Moss vs Lauren Hawley / Alexander Boardman4-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#3 DoublesColby Sanford / Max Tsao vs Courtney Taylor / Kevin Burr0-6, 1-6
2024-06-22vs QRRC HawleyWon 10
W#1 DoublesYakov Diskin / Shannon Young vs Alexander Boardman / Lauren Hawley6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-06-14vs QRRC HawleySplit 11
W#1 DoublesJack Siehl / Clara Owen vs Alexander Boardman / Lauren Hawley6-3, 7-6
L#3 DoublesAnne Lutz / Max Tsao vs Todd Rich / Taylor Pritt3-6, 1-6
2024-06-01vs QRRC HawleyLost 12
L#1 DoublesCole Moss / Shannon Young vs David Peyton / Rheanna Morehart6-4, 4-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesJack Siehl / Clara Owen vs Todd Rich / Meghan Sorensen6-4, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRichard Heilman / Anne Lutz vs Jeremy Flora / Taylor Pritt3-6, 5-7
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 2024 MXD 18&O 10.0 Dayton
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1QRRC Hawley4210819158
2FSSC Klank2481024186

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.25 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Audree Mcnichols
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 5
Diana Ivanikhina
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published 5
4.57
Cole Moss
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 5
4.46
Shannon Young
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Colby Sanford
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4.5
4.25
Anne Lutz
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 4.5
4.17
Philip Brumbaugh
usually #2 Doubles 57%, also #1 Doubles 43% · published
4.17
Matt Critchfield
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
4.11
Conrad Klank
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 4.5
4.05
Samuel Songer
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Jack Siehl
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Max Tsao
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Noah Boyce
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
Richard Heilman
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Robert Lehner
published
Yakov Diskin
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Philip Brumbaugh + Diana Ivanikhina6252% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Audree Mcnichols
10W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Diana Ivanikhina
8W–7L career · type M · 7 lines in 2024
not enough data
5
Cole Moss
12W–20L career · 4 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.57
Shannon Young
20W–10L career · 4 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.46
4.5
Colby Sanford
1W–5L career · type M · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
4.5
Anne Lutz
68W–35L career · 5 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
4.25
Philip Brumbaugh
17W–23L career · 7 lines in 2024
11%88%1%
4.17
Matt Critchfield
54W–57L career · 3 lines in 2024
12%87%1%
4.17
4.5
Conrad Klank
38W–52L career · 4 lines in 2024
22%77%<1%
4.11
Samuel Songer
12W–27L career · 2 lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
4.05
Jack Siehl
7W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Max Tsao
7W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Noah Boyce
0W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Richard Heilman
43W–64L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Robert Lehner
20W–20L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Yakov Diskin
33W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.