Teams

HOCO-SIMS

2024 MATA USTA Adult 18 & Over - Spring · 4.0 Low Women Night Wednesday

7 players · average NTRP 3.50 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for 4.0 Low Women Night Wednesday have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.28 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.54
Marian Wharton
published
3.35
Angela Easom
published 3.5
3.32
Eima Sims
published
3.32
Jenelle Floyd
published
3.13
Charlie Arnold
published 3.5
3.02
Joann Sanchez
published
Klarizza Jane Yu
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marian Wharton
31W–27L career · no lines in 2024
<1%39%61%
3.54
3.5
Angela Easom
17W–11L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
3.35
Eima Sims
8W–15L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
Jenelle Floyd
5W–9L career · no lines in 2024
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Charlie Arnold
18W–19L career · no lines in 2024
19%81%<1%
3.13
Joann Sanchez
13W–17L career · no lines in 2024
45%55%<1%
3.02
Klarizza Jane Yu
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.