Teams

WNCW Brians (ARC South)

Adult 18 & Over USTA WNC 2026 · 18+ Adult Men 3.5 Wed

11 players · average NTRP 3.50 / NORTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2026-05-20vs WNCA Thompson (Brevard)Won 30
W#1 DoublesBen Huggins / David Kreeger vs Stanley Treece / Thang Chu6-3, 5-7, 1-0
W#1 SinglesDave Kroondyk vs Carl Michael Uy6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesWilliam Jimenez / Tom Shalloe vs Charles LeGrand / Clark Lovelace6-1, 6-2
2026-05-13vs WNCC Nelson (CCA)Won 32
W#1 DoublesWilliam Krueger / David Garrett vs Tait Piercy / Craig Nelson6-2, 7-6
L#1 SinglesWilliam Jimenez vs Peter Ripmaster0-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesHeath Cope / Javier Garcia vs Andrew Johnson / Matt Doumar5-7, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 SinglesJavier Zambrano vs Thomas Hostetler4-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesWinfield Brians / Tom Shalloe vs Francis Mabunga / Ian Mcansh6-3, 6-2
2026-05-11vs WNCD Mason (HRC)Won 40
W#1 DoublesDave Kroondyk / William Krueger vs Stephen Gay / Josh Comstock6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Brock / Ben Huggins vs Dennis Mason / Josh Wright6-0, 6-3
W#2 SinglesJavier Zambrano vs Thomas Peaden4-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#3 DoublesWinfield Brians / Javier Garcia vs Matt Roland / Hilawe Semunegus6-3, 6-1
2026-04-29vs WNCC Nelson (CCA)Won 40
W#1 DoublesDave Kroondyk / William Krueger vs Tait Piercy / Craig Nelson6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesWilliam Jimenez vs Peter Ripmaster4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Brock / Ben Huggins vs Thomas Hostetler / Craig Mcansh6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesWinfield Brians / David Kreeger vs Brent Edelman / Daniel Berchenko6-2, 6-1
2026-04-22vs WNCD Mason (HRC)Won 41
W#1 DoublesBen Huggins / William Krueger vs Thomas Peaden / Josh Wright7-6, 6-2
W#1 SinglesJavier Zambrano vs Alex Keever6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesWinfield Brians / Benjamin Brock vs Chris Westmoreland / Stephen Gay7-6, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDave Kroondyk vs Jordan Stiles4-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesHeath Cope / Mark Beno vs Dennis Mason / Hilawe Semunegus3-6, 1-6
2026-04-18vs WNCA Thompson (Brevard)Won 41
W#1 DoublesWilliam Krueger / William Jimenez vs Alfred Thompson / Carl Michael Uy6-2, 6-3
L#1 SinglesJavier Zambrano vs Daniel Spagnoli4-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesBen Huggins / Benjamin Brock vs Ross Hyatt / Miles Demott6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesDave Kroondyk vs Kenneth Lovett1-0
W#3 DoublesMark Beno / Heath Cope vs Charles LeGrand / Clark Lovelace6-4, 6-1
2026-04-15vs WNCJ Stephens (ARC South)Won 21
W#1 DoublesBenjamin Brock / Dave Kroondyk vs Ryan Medrano / Devin Brown6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesWilliam Jimenez vs Michael Brasunas6-3, 6-3
L#2 DoublesHeath Cope / Tom Shalloe vs Robin Smith-Martin / Adam Knochowski6-3, 2-6, 0-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18+ Adult Men 3.5 Wed have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.36 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.73
Dave Kroondyk
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.53
Ben Huggins
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #1 Doubles 40% · published 3.5
3.43
William Jimenez
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published
3.39
William Krueger
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.35
Benjamin Brock
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.33
Winfield Brians
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.31
Javier Zambrano
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
David Kreeger
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.11
Tom Shalloe
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.03
Heath Cope
usually #2 Doubles 44%, also #3 Doubles 44% · published
Mark Beno
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

William Krueger + Dave Kroondyk8066% games+6.8% vs expected
Benjamin Brock + Winfield Brians224 matchesnot enough data
Benjamin Brock + Ben Huggins303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Dave Kroondyk
96W–23L career · 6 lines in 2026
<1%5%95%
3.73
3.5
Ben Huggins
9W–0L career · type S · 5 lines in 2026
<1%43%57%
3.53
William Jimenez
6W–4L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%70%30%
3.43
William Krueger
25W–21L career · 5 lines in 2026
<1%78%21%
3.39
3.5
Benjamin Brock
16W–3L career · 5 lines in 2026
1%84%15%
3.35
Winfield Brians
19W–10L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%88%11%
3.33
Javier Zambrano
8W–5L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.31
3.5
David Kreeger
2W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Tom Shalloe
19W–21L career · 3 lines in 2026
21%78%<1%
3.11
Heath Cope
28W–17L career · 9 lines in 2026
<1%42%58%
3.03
Mark Beno
4W–11L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.