Teams

Pierce-Baseline Mafia-Woodlands Parks

2026 Adult 55 & Over 6.0 - 9.0 NoHo Men · 7.0 55 & Over Men

8 players · average NTRP 3.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2026-03-28vs Fredricksen-Woodlands ParksWon 20
W#1 DoublesLuis Felipe Cordoba / Jeff Hechler vs Mark Ramsey / Bob Hanlon3-6, 6-3, 1-0
W#2 DoublesAllan Bechter / Oscar Mejia vs Eric Fredricksen / Greg Etchison6-2, 6-4
2026-03-07vs Fredricksen-Woodlands ParksWon 30
W#1 DoublesOscar Mejia / Chad Carrow vs Bob Hanlon / Gene McCarron6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesAllan Bechter / Kevin Whitenight vs Mark Ramsey / Garrett van Osdell6-2, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKevin McGuirk / Timothy Pierce vs David Peterson / Greg Etchison2-6, 6-4, 1-0
2026-03-01vs Fredricksen-Woodlands ParksLost 03
L#1 DoublesKevin Whitenight / Timothy Pierce vs Bob Hanlon / Gene McCarron2-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesChad Carrow / Jeff Hechler vs Mark Ramsey / Garrett van Osdell1-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesKevin McGuirk / Oscar Mejia vs David Peterson / Greg Etchison6-1, 6-7, 0-1
2026-02-22vs Fredricksen-Woodlands ParksWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllan Bechter / Kevin Whitenight vs Mark Ramsey / Garrett van Osdell7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesKevin McGuirk / Luis Felipe Cordoba vs Gene McCarron / Wade Leake6-2, 6-3
L#3 DoublesChad Carrow / Jeff Hechler vs Eric Fredricksen / Greg Etchison3-6, 3-6
2026-02-21vs Fredricksen-Woodlands ParksWon 21
W#1 DoublesAllan Bechter / Kevin McGuirk vs Mark Ramsey / David Peterson6-1, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJeff Hechler / Luis Felipe Cordoba vs Bob Hanlon / Garrett van Osdell6-4, 6-1
L#3 DoublesTimothy Pierce / Oscar Mejia vs Gene McCarron / Greg Jones4-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings2 teams · 7.0 55 & Over Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Pierce-Baseline Mafia-Woodlands Parks4110513113
2Fredricksen-Woodlands Parks1451021148

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.50
Allan Bechter
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 3.5
3.33
Jeff Hechler
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.17
Chad Carrow
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Kevin McGuirk
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Kevin Whitenight
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Luis Felipe Cordoba
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Oscar Mejia
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Timothy Pierce
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Allan Bechter
4W–0L career · 4 lines in 2026
<1%50%50%
3.50
Jeff Hechler
72W–66L career · 4 lines in 2026
1%90%9%
3.33
3.5
Chad Carrow
10W–15L career · 3 lines in 2026
9%90%1%
3.17
Kevin McGuirk
30W–15L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Kevin Whitenight
26W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Luis Felipe Cordoba
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data
Oscar Mejia
18W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
not enough data
Timothy Pierce
29W–20L career · 3 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.