Teams

Flanagan 40+ 3.5 Mixed Tues PM

2025 Piedmont Mixed Doubles 40 · 3.5 Mxd Tues PM

14 players · average NTRP 3.42 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule10 played
2025-07-29vs Whichard 40+ 3.5 Mixed Tues PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesAshley Fuquay / Emily Wilson vs Martin Mailloux / Kimberly Halsey6-7, 1-6
W#1 DoublesBritt Flanagan / Thomas Dagger vs Charlotte Boone / Chip Perrin6-2, 6-2
W#2 DoublesChristina Mohorn / Charles Freeman vs Susan Shughart / James McIntyre6-4, 6-1
2025-07-15vs Tapler/OFRC 40+ 3.5 Mixed Tues PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesKevin Dover / Julie Dover vs Richard Emmendorfer / Ginger Ballard6-1, 6-4
W#2 DoublesLuke Rhoten / Reeves Rhoten vs Brian Maloney / Jennifer Klein6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesChristina Mohorn / Thomas Dagger vs Chad Davis / Diane Puckett6-3, 6-2
2025-07-01vs Kirby 40+ 3.5 Mixed Tues PMLost 01
L#2 DoublesEmily Wilson / Ashley Fuquay vs Bill Vary / Margaret Joseph0-6, 1-6
2025-06-24vs Ward 40+ 3.5 Mixed Tues PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesEmily Wilson / Ashley Fuquay vs Brian Henderson / Elizabeth Deterding6-0, 6-3
2025-06-17vs HERRON 40+ 3.5 Mixed Tues PMWon 21
L#1 DoublesKevin Dover / Mary Winstead vs Stephanie Keaney / Benjamin Rainwater3-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLuke Rhoten / Reeves Rhoten vs Marsha Tice / Henry Scott6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesBritt Flanagan / Ashley Fuquay vs Judy Eaton / Jon Knight6-2, 5-7, 1-0
2025-06-10vs Miller 40+ 3.5 Mixed Tues PMWon 30
W#1 DoublesAprille Black / Kevin Greene vs Carrie Tauber / Tom Barringer6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesBritt Flanagan / Charles Freeman vs Stephen Miller / Frida Nordmark6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesThomas Dagger / Julie Dover vs Wendy Ingle / Jeff Ingle6-2, 6-4
2025-06-03vs VANNAVONG 40+ 3.5 Mixed Tues PMLost 12
L#1 DoublesLuke Rhoten / Reeves Rhoten vs Alina Vannavong / David Grubbs2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKevin Dover / Julie Dover vs Jason Lewis / Gina Goy6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesAshley Fuquay / Mary Winstead vs Anthony Jackson / Kelly Pryzwansky6-7, 3-6
2025-05-27vs GORHAM 40+ 3.5 Mixed Tues PMWon 21
W#1 DoublesKevin Dover / Mary Winstead vs Gary Sadowniczak / Missy Chance6-2, 6-4
L#2 DoublesCourtney Dagger / Thomas Dagger vs David Rachels / Betsey Wells3-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesChristina Mohorn / Charles Freeman vs Janet Gorham / Steve A'Della6-3, 6-0
2025-05-20vs Dymek 40+ 3.5 Mixed Tues PMWon 10
W#1 DoublesLuke Rhoten / Emily Wilson vs Kelly Guyler / Blake Guyler6-3, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Mxd Tues PM have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.30 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.69
Julie Dover
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.63
Kevin Dover
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
3.57
Luke Rhoten
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.49
Ashley Fuquay
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
Christina Mohorn
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.32
Reeves Rhoten
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.30
Britt Flanagan
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
Charles Freeman
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.17
Aprille Black
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.08
Thomas Dagger
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
3.04
Emily Wilson
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.02
Mary Winstead
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.96
Courtney Dagger
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Patrick Flanagan
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Julie Dover + Kevin Dover6163% games+8.3% vs expected
Reeves Rhoten + Luke Rhoten7264% games+3.5% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Julie Dover
40W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
9%90%1%
3.69
Kevin Dover
45W–9L career · 4 lines in 2025
<1%18%82%
3.63
Luke Rhoten
49W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%31%69%
3.57
3.5
Ashley Fuquay
34W–17L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%53%47%
3.49
3.5
Christina Mohorn
34W–41L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Reeves Rhoten
30W–15L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
3.5
Britt Flanagan
13W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
3.5
Charles Freeman
3W–0L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Aprille Black
11W–19L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
3.17
Thomas Dagger
4W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
29%71%<1%
3.08
Emily Wilson
178W–123L career · 4 lines in 2025
38%62%<1%
3.04
Mary Winstead
15W–22L career · 3 lines in 2025
43%56%<1%
3.02
3
Courtney Dagger
37W–29L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%60%40%
2.96
Patrick Flanagan
3W–3L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.