Teams

BBTC - Findley

2024 Adult 18 & Over-GC · Men 2.5

11 players · average NTRP 2.62 / MISSISSIPPI

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2024-03-27vs BBTC 2.5 MenLost 03
L#1 DoublesSchaeffer Dane / Frank Dawson vs Chris Spear / Barry Regula1-6, 4-6
L#1 SinglesRicky Stegall vs Scott Pridgen6-7, 6-6
L#2 DoublesJared Johnson / JOHN ONEAL vs Colin Steenkamp / Christopher Smith1-6, 3-6
2024-03-19vs TOCC 2.5 MenLost 02
L#1 DoublesJason Sumrall / John Stolarski vs Jordan Roussel / Cody Frierson3-6, 2-6
L#2 DoublesRicky Stegall / Frank Dawson vs Robert Carter / Benjamin Bourcy2-6, 2-6
2024-03-14vs BBTC 2.5 MenWon 21
L#1 DoublesJason Sumrall / Ricky Stegall vs Colin Steenkamp / Christopher Smith0-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#1 SinglesHunter Hanson vs Chris Spear6-2, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSchaeffer Dane / Kris Findley vs Darin Berdine / Barry Regula4-6, 6-1, 1-0
2024-02-28vs TOCC 2.5 MenWon 21
W#1 DoublesDale Brehm / John Stolarski vs Robert Carter / Stewart Wood6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesFrank Dawson vs Ross Pinson0-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesSchaeffer Dane / Ricky Stegall vs Benjamin Schrock / Solly Chedid6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 2.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.47 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.93
Hunter Hanson
usually #3 Doubles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.53
Jason Sumrall
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.50
Dale Brehm
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.44
Ricky Stegall
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
2.42
Trevor Rockstad
published
2.33
Kris Findley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Frank Dawson
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 2.5
2.15
JOHN ONEAL
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published 2.5
John Stolarski
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Schaeffer Dane
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Thomas Strange
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Hunter Hanson
28W–13L career · 6 lines in 2024
<1%71%29%
2.93
Jason Sumrall
26W–38L career · 6 lines in 2024
41%59%<1%
2.53
2.5
Dale Brehm
35W–29L career · 1 line in 2024
0%52%48%
2.50
Ricky Stegall
12W–28L career · 4 lines in 2024
0%68%32%
2.44
Trevor Rockstad
12W–13L career · no lines in 2024
0%73%27%
2.42
Kris Findley
19W–38L career · 1 line in 2024
0%90%10%
2.33
2.5
Frank Dawson
3W–16L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
JOHN ONEAL
4W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.15
John Stolarski
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Schaeffer Dane
13W–15L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Thomas Strange
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.