← Teams

MAC-Bosworth

2024 Adult 40 & Over · 3.0 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.75 estimated across 6 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

—
Trevor Hammond
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
2.91
Nathan Bernhardt
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.86
Claude Bosworth
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.79
Jack Dempsey
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
—
Joshua Husbands
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
—
Taylor Boyko
published 3
2.72
Brian Parker
usually #1 Doubles 43%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3
2.71
Marshall Levine
usually #1 Singles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.51
Keith Ketterling
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
—
Todd Elliott
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Results8 ties
2024-06-17Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesMarshall Levine / Brian Parker vs Monte Gonzales / Seth Wagner7-5, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesClaude Bosworth vs Lawrence Cooper6-1, 6-3
W#2 DoublesJohn Michael Murphy / Nathan Bernhardt vs Michael Rich / David Williams3-6, 7-6, 1-0
2024-06-01Won 3–0
W#1 DoublesTrevor Hammond / Tim Jakubowski vs Maarten Schreuder / Fabio Santos Nallem6-3, 6-3
W#1 SinglesJoshua Husbands vs Matthew Lucas6-3, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJack Dempsey / Brian Parker vs Matthew Thoreson / Stephen Blum6-1, 6-2
2024-05-19Lost 1–2
W#1 DoublesTrevor Hammond / Nathan Bernhardt vs Justin Foster / Jian Chen7-5, 6-3
L#1 SinglesMarshall Levine vs Robert Piercy6-0, 6-2
L#3 DoublesJared Shipley / Keith Ketterling vs David Vail / Christopher Jones6-1, 6-4
2024-05-11Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesJohn Michael Murphy / Brian Parker vs Scott Dickinson / DeWayne Ledbetter6-4, 6-1
L#2 DoublesTodd Elliott / Jared Shipley vs Philip Mikolaj / Sven Louis6-1, 6-1
L#3 DoublesIsael Soto / Marshall Levine vs Robert Crawford / Luis Ortiz6-2, 6-2
2024-05-04Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesBrian Parker / Jack Dempsey vs Seungho Ham / Jose Hwang6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesMarshall Levine vs Seung-Hee Bae5-7, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesKeith Ketterling / Jared Shipley vs Jinman Jun / Kyu Hun Kim7-6, 6-2
2024-04-26Won 2–0
W#1 SinglesTrevor Hammond vs Dan Blaker7-6, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJack Dempsey / Brian Parker vs Masataka Hayashi / Timothy Morris6-1, 6-1
2024-04-21Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesNathan Ayotte / Trevor Hammond vs Dan Blaker / Peter Casey6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJack Dempsey / Brian Parker vs Daniel Rasay / Timothy Morris6-0, 6-0
2024-04-14Lost 1–3
L#1 DoublesClaude Bosworth / Nathan Bernhardt vs Will Bayon / Jason Floyd6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesMarshall Levine vs Skip Potter3-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#2 DoublesTrevor Hammond / Peter Schulman vs Robert Crawford / Philip Mikolaj6-1, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJack Dempsey / Brian Parker vs Chris Cormack / Sven Louis6-4, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3.5
Trevor Hammond
21W–4L career
not enough data
—
3
Nathan Bernhardt
42W–38L career
0%94%6%
2.91
3
Claude Bosworth
38W–71L career
0%98%2%
2.86
3
Jack Dempsey
17W–36L career
6%87%7%
2.79
3
Joshua Husbands
33W–36L career
not enough data
—
3
Taylor Boyko
7W–10L career
not enough data
—
3
Brian Parker
36W–48L career
2%98%0%
2.72
3
Marshall Levine
9W–34L career
5%94%1%
2.71
3
Keith Ketterling
13W–23L career · type S
33%67%0%
2.51
2.5
Todd Elliott
2W–6L career
not enough data
—

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.