Teams

Cooper

2024 FW Tri-Level · Womens 3.5-4.0-4.5

9 players · average NTRP 4.50 / TEXAS

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-11-03vs BusbyLost 01
L#3 DoublesSandi Shipley / Martha Davis vs Chelsea James / Andree Kale1-6, 4-6
2024-11-03vs LeeWon 30
W#1 DoublesEmarely Rosa-Davila / Ashley Reaves vs Kalisha Lee / Julia Odietus6-0, 6-4
W#2 DoublesSonia Redwine / Theresa Batoon vs Teresa Ingram / Karin Fisher6-4, 3-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Saenz / Gina Stewart vs Kay Gaskill / Debbie Greenwood6-3, 6-1
2024-11-02vs Double the FunWon 21
W#1 DoublesMarcela Serna / Ashley Reaves vs Jill Montgomery / Aubrey Findley6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesEricka Bailey / Sandi Shipley vs Mimi Tran / Amy Dabbous6-4, 3-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMaria Saenz / Gina Stewart vs Ruth Strong / Rebecca Kolo6-2, 6-3
2024-11-01vs BusbyLost 01
L#3 DoublesMozhdeh Asadidezfouli / Sandi Shipley vs Andree Kale / Chelsea James1-6, 1-6
2024-11-01vs AlbusLost 12
W#1 DoublesEmarely Rosa-Davila / Marcela Serna vs Stephanie Prats / Pamela Kvale6-2, 2-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesTheresa Batoon / Sonia Redwine vs Kerry Schonwald / Mariajose Alvarez3-6, 3-6
L#3 DoublesPaula Cooper / Maria Saenz vs Teresa Albus / Kirti Kale2-6, 4-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Womens 3.5-4.0-4.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.83 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.39
Ashley Reaves
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4.5
4.01
Marcela Serna
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.77
Sandi Shipley
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.74
Sonia Redwine
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.68
Theresa Batoon
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.62
Gina Stewart
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.58
Paula Cooper
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Emarely Rosa-Davila
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Maria Saenz
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Theresa Batoon + Sonia Redwine7362% games+6.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Ashley Reaves
40W–11L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
4.39
Marcela Serna
13W–14L career · 2 lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
4.01
Sandi Shipley
26W–17L career · 3 lines in 2024
3%92%5%
3.77
Sonia Redwine
13W–3L career · 2 lines in 2024
4%93%3%
3.74
Theresa Batoon
28W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.68
Gina Stewart
23W–17L career · 2 lines in 2024
20%79%<1%
3.62
Paula Cooper
9W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
29%71%<1%
3.58
Emarely Rosa-Davila
2W–1L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Saenz
5W–1L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.