Teams

KY/HEN/OSBORN, Sally 8.5 Combo

2024 40 & Over SO COMBO DOUBLES HEN · 8.5 Ladies

6 players · average NTRP 4.00 / KENTUCKY

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
2024-09-16vs KY/HEN/CLAYTONWon 20
W#1 DoublesShellee Starks / Sally Osborn vs Brenda Clayton / Stephanie Gray6-0, 6-0
W#2 DoublesShannon Hulse / Kelly Keown vs Ana Maria Vega / Kerry Bodenheimer6-2, 6-2
2024-09-09vs KY/HEN/CLAYTONWon 20
W#1 DoublesShannon Hulse / Sally Osborn vs Brenda Clayton / Kerry Bodenheimer6-4, 6-4
W#2 DoublesShellee Starks / Jennifer Raibley vs Ana Maria Vega / Stephanie Gray6-4, 6-4
2024-09-02vs KY/HEN/CLAYTONWon 21
W#1 DoublesShellee Starks / Kelly Keown vs Brenda Clayton / Stephanie Gray6-0, 6-0
L#2 DoublesShannon Hulse / Jennifer Raibley vs Ana Maria Vega / Kerry Bodenheimer6-7, 4-6
W#3 DoublesChristine Clements / Cindy Mitchell vs Lorien Appman / Elizabeth Scheessele6-3, 7-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 8.5 Ladies have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.82 estimated across 4 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.89
Jennifer Raibley
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
3.83
Christine Clements
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.80
Sally Osborn
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.78
Kelly Keown
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
Shannon Hulse
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Shellee Starks
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Sally Osborn + Kelly Keown6258% games−2.0% vs expected
Christine Clements + Jennifer Raibley314 matchesnot enough data
Sally Osborn + Jennifer Raibley224 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Jennifer Raibley
23W–15L career · 2 lines in 2024
<1%78%21%
3.89
4
Christine Clements
35W–18L career · 1 line in 2024
1%87%12%
3.83
Sally Osborn
59W–35L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%91%7%
3.80
Kelly Keown
47W–16L career · 2 lines in 2024
2%92%6%
3.78
Shannon Hulse
3W–3L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data
Shellee Starks
16W–6L career · 3 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.