Teams

Floyd-Anderson/18/4.5/M/BTC

2025 Shrev-Boss Adult 18 & Over - Men · 4.5 Shrev

11 players · average NTRP / LOUISIANA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
2025-04-01vs Wilson/18/4.5/M/POTCWon 21
W#1 SinglesLucas Richardson vs Mike Wayda6-2, 6-1
W#2 SinglesRidge Creech vs Jared Stanton6-3, 6-2
L#3 DoublesMichael Lauseng / Jonah Jones vs Harry Johnson / Norman Duhon5-7, 5-7
2025-03-22vs Wilson/18/4.5/M/POTCWon 40
W#1 DoublesSteven Schwab / Stafford Lyons vs Grady Wilson / Brian Bernard6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesMarc Paz vs Harry Johnson6-1, 6-2
W#2 DoublesSteven Floyd / Michael Lauseng vs Mike Wayda / Norman Duhon6-1, 6-3
W#2 SinglesKevin Chhang vs Jared Stanton6-1, 6-1
2025-03-16vs Wilson/18/4.5/M/POTCWon 50
W#1 DoublesKody Anderson / Jonah Jones vs Woodus Humphrey / Marcus Briggs6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesWill Street vs Jared Stanton6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesJonathon Clark / Stafford Lyons vs Norman Duhon / Stewart Rabb6-4, 6-2
W#2 SinglesKevin Chhang vs Harry Johnson6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesMarc Paz / Steven Floyd vs Stevie Schmidt / Jimmy Graves7-5, 6-2
2025-03-08vs Wilson/18/4.5/M/POTCWon 32
W#1 DoublesMarc Paz / Will Street vs Jimmy Graves / Woodus Humphrey6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLucas Richardson vs Jared Stanton6-0, 6-3
L#2 DoublesKody Anderson / Kevin Chhang vs Stevie Schmidt / Brian Bernard5-7, 4-6
W#2 SinglesJonathon Clark vs Grady Wilson3-0
L#3 DoublesMichael Lauseng / Jonah Jones vs Stewart Rabb / Harry Johnson7-6, 4-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 4.5 Shrev have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.24 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.53
Marc Paz
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
4.43
Lucas Richardson
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
4.41
Jonathon Clark
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
4.26
Will Street
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published
4.22
Kody Anderson
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.22
Stafford Lyons
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
4.17
Ridge Creech
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
3.70
Michael Lauseng
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 30% · published
Jonah Jones
usually #3 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published
Kevin Chhang
usually #2 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Steven Schwab
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Marc Paz
12W–2L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%42%58%
4.53
Lucas Richardson
9W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%70%30%
4.43
Jonathon Clark
11W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%74%25%
4.41
Will Street
7W–5L career · 2 lines in 2025
3%93%4%
4.26
Kody Anderson
8W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Stafford Lyons
9W–3L career · 2 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
4.22
Ridge Creech
3W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
11%88%1%
4.17
Michael Lauseng
22W–13L career · 10 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.70
Jonah Jones
2W–5L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
Kevin Chhang
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2025
not enough data
Steven Schwab
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.