Teams

SGV Maple Team-Lin-WN-SA10

2025 SoCal Doubles 18 & Over - San Gabriel Valley · SGV - Men 3.5

13 players · average NTRP 3.50 / SO.CALIFORNIA

View scouting list →
Schedule4 played
L#1 DoublesBryant Wu / Jie Wang vs Kawnmai Sumlut / Karan Kajla4-6, 6-4, 0-1
W#2 DoublesNeil Nieh / Lucian Tiongco vs Vinaya Kajla / Ramesh Bandaru6-3, 7-6
W#3 DoublesJun Yuan / Yonggang Zhang vs Aditya Kajla / Leighton Kekuewa6-0, 6-2
W#1 DoublesDong Kim / Andrew Yao vs Tyler Page / Clement Leung3-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#2 DoublesNeil Nieh / Jie Wang vs Rick Anderson / Daniel Sheehy7-5, 4-6, 1-0
L#1 DoublesDong Kim / Jacky Lin vs Clay Tweel / Hai Trinh4-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesJun Yuan / Yonggang Zhang vs Ethan Park / Jasen Ha2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesJie Wang / Neil Nieh vs Vacheh W Avanessian / Andy Baker6-2, 6-2
L#1 DoublesHaochuan Lin / Jacky Lin vs Vic Kan / Tony Law6-7, 1-6
L#2 DoublesJun Yuan / Andrew Yao vs Aaron Tam / Curtis Lu3-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesNeil Nieh / Lansing Chew vs Thai Nguyen / Abraam Guirguis3-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SGV - Men 3.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.22 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

Andrew Yao
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.58
Bryant Wu
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.48
Jun Yuan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Nam Kim
published
3.29
Neil Nieh
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.20
Yonggang Zhang
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
3.16
Jacky Lin
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.12
Andy Zang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.10
Haochuan Lin
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.10
Joel Pereda
published 3
3.08
Dong Kim
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.04
Lansing Chew
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.03
Lucian Tiongco
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Jun Yuan + Yonggang Zhang5549% games−6.7% vs expected
Jun Yuan + Jacky Lin5065% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4
Andrew Yao
19W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3.5
Bryant Wu
19W–10L career · 1 line in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.58
Jun Yuan
21W–11L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%56%44%
3.48
Nam Kim
10W–2L career · no lines in 2025
<1%72%28%
3.42
Neil Nieh
6W–5L career · 4 lines in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
Yonggang Zhang
10W–13L career · 2 lines in 2025
8%91%2%
3.20
Jacky Lin
20W–21L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%13%87%
3.16
3.5
Andy Zang
33W–21L career · 5 lines in 2025
21%79%<1%
3.12
Haochuan Lin
5W–6L career · 1 line in 2025
23%77%<1%
3.10
3
Joel Pereda
40W–22L career · no lines in 2025
<1%23%77%
3.10
Dong Kim
9W–4L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%29%71%
3.08
Lansing Chew
4W–7L career · 1 line in 2025
39%61%<1%
3.04
Lucian Tiongco
1W–3L career · 1 line in 2025
41%59%<1%
3.03

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.