Teams

WI Adult 55&O 7.0W NEL FCRC Backus Grey Geese

2022 WI Adult 55 & Over · WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3.33 / WISCONSIN

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
L#1 DoublesAnn Weiner / Ann Lindstrom vs Barb Robertson / Sheila Counts4-6, 3-6
L#1 DoublesSandra Moore / Ann Weiner vs Tracy Mitchell / Julie Kowalkowski7-6, 5-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMary Miller / Diane Ziegler vs Michelle Lampereur / Cheryl Thompson6-1, 6-0
W#3 DoublesShirley Connor / Susan Schmidt vs Carol Wilinski / Karrie Kowalkowski6-3, 6-1
W#2 DoublesSusan Schmidt / Diane Ziegler vs Rocky Calawerts / Charmaine Foley4-6, 6-1, 1-0
W#3 DoublesShirley Connor / Ann Weiner vs Theresa Palasota / Maureen McGrath7-5, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMary Miller / Ann Weiner vs Lori Monette / Lisa Brick1-6, 1-6
L#1 DoublesSusan Schmidt / Shirley Connor vs Melita Parker / Theresa Palasota2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesKathy Strickler / Ann Weiner vs Kim Perna / Kristi Yates1-6, 0-6
W#1 DoublesSusan Schmidt / Ann Weiner vs Cheryl Thompson / Laura Farah6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesKathy Strickler / Sandra Moore vs Ann Neerdaels / Michelle Lampereur6-2, 6-2
W#3 DoublesAnn Lindstrom / Mary Miller vs Karrie Kowalkowski / Julie Kowalkowski6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesSandra Moore / Ann Weiner vs Judy Umentum / Beth Ryder7-6, 6-1
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for WI Adult 55 & Over 7.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.13 estimated across 3 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.23
Ann Weiner
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #3 Doubles 29% · published 3.5
3.12
Diane Ziegler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.05
Shirley Connor
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Ann Lindstrom
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Kathy Backus
published
Kathy Strickler
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published
Linda Vanwyk
published
Sandra Moore
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Diane Ziegler + Kathy Backus4351% gamesnot enough data
Ann Weiner + Shirley Connor404 matchesnot enough data
Diane Ziegler + Shirley Connor123 matchesnot enough data
Kathy Backus + Shirley Connor303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Ann Weiner
67W–42L career · 7 lines in 2022
4%94%2%
3.23
3.5
Diane Ziegler
34W–24L career · 2 lines in 2022
19%81%<1%
3.12
Shirley Connor
54W–33L career · 3 lines in 2022
34%66%<1%
3.05
3
Ann Lindstrom
2W–6L career · 1 line in 2022
not enough data
Kathy Backus
17W–9L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Kathy Strickler
14W–9L career · 2 lines in 2022
not enough data
Linda Vanwyk
2W–1L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data
Sandra Moore
3W–6L career · no lines in 2022
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.