Teams

CROW CANYON CC 18MX8.0A

2024 MIXED 18&Over · 18&Over MX8.0

13 players · average NTRP 3.90 / NO. CALIFORNIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule6 played
2024-03-24Lost 01
L#1 DoublesMargaret Harrison / Dean Christman vs Andrew Huang / Jade Yang2-2
2024-03-18Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMiriam DeQuadros / Andrew Stinnett vs Connie J Chang / Nathan Gong2-6, 3-6
2024-02-28vs BAY CLUB PL 18MX8.0ALost 02
L#2 DoublesRyan Semmelmeyer / Margaret Harrison vs Jeff Wong / Yalin Yan2-6, 7-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesAndrew Stinnett / Miriam DeQuadros vs Angela Lemke / Marty Gee4-6, 1-6
2024-02-27Lost 01
L#3 DoublesMiriam DeQuadros / Andrew Stinnett vs Thomas Lyhne / Rebecca Kay5-7, 3-6
2024-02-21vs PLEASANTON 18MX8.0CLost 01
L#3 DoublesAndrew Stinnett / Miriam DeQuadros vs Susan Aneja / Michael O'Hara5-7, 7-5, 0-1
2024-01-07vs Bay Club Fremont 18MX8.0BWon 10
W#2 DoublesKevin Jarvis / Margaret Harrison vs Mary Ow / Eric Zhong6-3, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 18&Over MX8.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.62 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.97
Margaret Harrison
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
3.85
Andrew Stinnett
published 4
3.81
Sonia Barnoff
published
3.69
Jim Kruger
published
3.66
Heather Houston
published
3.58
Sean Baker
published
3.57
Jason Cherry
published
3.56
3.54
Anand Sahasram
published 4
3.52
Miriam DeQuadros
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
3.51
Fran Hazell
published 4
3.22
Dean Christman
published 3.5
Ryan Semmelmeyer
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Margaret Harrison + Andrew Stinnett6064% games+8.9% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Margaret Harrison
325W–140L career · 3 lines in 2024
<1%59%41%
3.97
4
Andrew Stinnett
23W–10L career · no lines in 2024
1%85%14%
3.85
Sonia Barnoff
18W–5L career · no lines in 2024
1%90%9%
3.81
Jim Kruger
6W–9L career · no lines in 2024
9%90%1%
3.69
Heather Houston
9W–10L career · no lines in 2024
13%87%1%
3.66
Sean Baker
3W–2L career · no lines in 2024
28%72%<1%
3.58
Jason Cherry
12W–4L career · no lines in 2024
30%70%<1%
3.57
4
Adrienne Cummings
6W–3L career · no lines in 2024
34%66%<1%
3.56
4
Anand Sahasram
5W–12L career · no lines in 2024
38%62%<1%
3.54
Miriam DeQuadros
126W–100L career · 4 lines in 2024
<1%44%56%
3.52
4
Fran Hazell
8W–10L career · no lines in 2024
46%54%<1%
3.51
3.5
Dean Christman
13W–12L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
3.22
Ryan Semmelmeyer
4W–5L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.