Teams

Riverstone /Stein

2025 Collier Adult 18 & Over Winter · 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men

17 players · average NTRP 3.70 / REGION_7

View scouting list →
Schedule3 played
W#1 DoublesRyan Wells / David Kolesar vs Sarkis Etoian / Miguel Pinto6-3, 6-4
L#1 SinglesJoshua Buckman vs Pedro Gomez5-7, 2-6
L#2 DoublesDaniel Mendoza / Jim Halpin vs Gregory Beard / Tim Gordon3-6, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 SinglesPaul Knapp vs Stanislav Savov4-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesSean Harrigan / Brian Chomniak vs Shep Burr / Ben Yocom6-2, 6-1
L#1 DoublesMichael Elliott / Matt Pittsford vs Gregory Beard / Tim Gordon1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesJim Halpin vs Pedro Gomez2-6, 1-6
W#2 DoublesBenjamin Stevens / Sean Harrigan vs Ben Yocom / Sarkis Etoian6-4, 7-5
L#2 SinglesScott Monette vs Stanislav Savov2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesBrian Chomniak / Ryan Wells vs Robert Folger / Grant Gutwein6-3, 3-6, 0-1
W#1 DoublesRyan Wells / David Kolesar vs Al Hazard / Miguel Pinto6-1, 7-6
L#1 SinglesDaniel Mendoza vs Pedro Gomez1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesJim Halpin / Sean Harrigan vs Gregory Beard / Tim Gordon6-1, 2-6, 1-0
W#2 SinglesScott Monette vs Stanislav Savov5-7, 5-2
W#3 DoublesBrian Chomniak / Paul Knapp vs Ben Yocom / Shep Burr7-5, 3-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Adult 18 & Over - Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.33 estimated across 15 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.64
Sean Harrigan
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.51
Douglas Wettergren
published
3.49
Daniel Mendoza
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published 4
3.47
David Kolesar
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.47
Richard Lancellot
published
3.47
Ryan Wells
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
3.35
Benjamin Stevens
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.34
James Stein
published
3.32
Matt Pittsford
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.30
Jim Halpin
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 33% · published
3.29
Joshua Buckman
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
3.21
Brian Chomniak
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.16
Brett Conlon
published 3.5
2.99
Rob Valerio
published
2.92
Michael Elliott
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Paul Knapp
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 50% · published
Scott Monette
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Matt Pittsford + Jim Halpin5445% games−0.3% vs expected
Brian Chomniak + Sean Harrigan123 matchesnot enough data
James Stein + Matt Pittsford213 matchesnot enough data
Daniel Mendoza + Sean Harrigan303 matchesnot enough data
Benjamin Stevens + Brett Conlon213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Sean Harrigan
27W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%16%84%
3.64
Douglas Wettergren
10W–10L career · no lines in 2025
<1%46%54%
3.51
4
Daniel Mendoza
11W–19L career · 2 lines in 2025
53%47%<1%
3.49
4
David Kolesar
93W–36L career · 2 lines in 2025
58%42%<1%
3.47
Richard Lancellot
3W–19L career · no lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
Ryan Wells
38W–9L career · 3 lines in 2025
<1%58%42%
3.47
3.5
Benjamin Stevens
14W–11L career · 2 lines in 2025
1%85%14%
3.35
James Stein
7W–8L career · no lines in 2025
1%87%12%
3.34
Matt Pittsford
14W–12L career · 1 line in 2025
1%89%10%
3.32
Jim Halpin
16W–17L career · 3 lines in 2025
2%91%8%
3.30
Joshua Buckman
8W–11L career · 1 line in 2025
2%91%7%
3.29
3.5
Brian Chomniak
6W–8L career · 3 lines in 2025
6%92%2%
3.21
3.5
Brett Conlon
11W–14L career · no lines in 2025
13%86%1%
3.16
Rob Valerio
0W–3L career · no lines in 2025
52%48%<1%
2.99
Michael Elliott
29W–36L career · 1 line in 2025
73%27%<1%
2.92
Paul Knapp
1W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Scott Monette
2W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.