Teams

*3-HRemley-Eno-40

2024 Eno River Adult 40 & Over · 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Women Evening

8 players · average NTRP 4.70 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-04-25vs *5-APlachco-EnoWon 10
W#1 SinglesLeslie Boesch vs Maureen Sredl6-1, 6-1
2024-04-18vs *1-VDirschl-HVCCWon 20
W#1 DoublesLeslie Boesch / Karen Griffin vs Neeta Vora / Mollie Williams3-6, 6-0, 1-0
W#2 DoublesHeather Remley / Anne Frautschi vs Julie Crawford / Meredith Howell6-1, 6-3
2024-04-11vs *2-DWare-HRWon 20
W#1 SinglesHeather Remley vs Beth Huebner6-3, 6-1
W#3 DoublesLeslie Boesch / Lindsey Moore vs Donna Ware / Jennifer Barrow6-0, 6-1
2024-03-28vs *4-RDavis-EnoWon 10
W#1 SinglesLeslie Boesch vs Shelly Kirkpatrick6-2, 6-3
2024-03-14vs *5-APlachco-EnoWon 20
W#1 SinglesLeslie Boesch vs Cheryl Reid4-6, 6-2, 1-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Remley / Miranda Harmon vs Kristin Lahey / Sarah Grant7-6, 4-6
2024-03-07vs *1-VDirschl-HVCCWon 20
W#1 SinglesLeslie Boesch vs Laura Loehr6-2, 6-0
W#3 DoublesHeather Remley / Thanawan Hahn vs Meredith Howell / Stacey Burkert6-4, 6-4
2024-02-22vs *2-DWare-HRWon 20
W#1 DoublesHeather Remley / Jennifer Reese vs Beth Huebner / Beth Loeb6-1, 6-1
W#1 SinglesLeslie Boesch vs Geraldine Smith6-1, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 4.5 Women Evening have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.33 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.73
Anne Frautschi
published 5
4.46
Leslie Boesch
usually #1 Singles 71%, also #3 Doubles 14% · published 4.5
4.42
Heather Remley
usually #3 Doubles 40%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 5
4.39
Betsy Shoffner
published 4.5
4.37
Tanya Parise
published 4.5
4.35
Jennifer Reese
published
4.30
Thanawan Hahn
published
3.65
Miranda Harmon
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Leslie Boesch + Heather Remley3455% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Reese + Betsy Shoffner4164% gamesnot enough data
Jennifer Reese + Heather Remley033 matchesnot enough data
Heather Remley + Tanya Parise303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Anne Frautschi
2W–2L career · no lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.73
4.5
Leslie Boesch
243W–102L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%62%38%
4.46
5
Heather Remley
298W–153L career · 5 lines in 2024
no projection at this level
4.42
4.5
Betsy Shoffner
98W–20L career · no lines in 2024
<1%78%22%
4.39
4.5
Tanya Parise
97W–53L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%18%
4.37
Jennifer Reese
29W–12L career · no lines in 2024
1%86%14%
4.35
Thanawan Hahn
23W–6L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
4.30
Miranda Harmon
21W–19L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
3.65

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.