← Teams

PTC-Wagner/Davis

2024 Adult 18 & Over · 3.0 Women

8 players · average NTRP 3 · USTA/PACIFIC NW / NORTHERN OREGON

View scouting list →
Scouting

Roster averages 2.86 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Greta Miracle
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published 3
3.02
Thao Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Shannon Davis
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3
2.88
Jennifer Oh
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.84
Valerie Neill
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.76
Beth Lussenhop
usually #2 Singles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3
2.73
Gwen Kulak
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.65
Michelle Cortez
usually #2 Doubles 83%, also #3 Doubles 17% · published 3
Results9 ties
2024-03-23Won 2–0
W#1 DoublesValerie Neill / Kate Oliver vs Suki Birge / Melanie DeSilva7-6, 4-3
W#2 DoublesJoanna Asia Wagner / Michelle Cortez vs Cynthia Ross-Brockett / Kay Hallmark6-7, 6-2
2024-03-09Lost 1–2
L#2 DoublesValerie Neill / Greta Miracle vs Megan Heyworth / Robin Bowerfind6-3, 6-2
W#2 SinglesBeth Lussenhop vs Amy Risch6-4, 3-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesMichelle Cortez / Holly Lee vs Elena Buller / Margo Yohner6-7, 6-4, 1-0
2024-02-24Won 4–0
W#1 DoublesValerie Neill / Shannon Davis vs Grainne Koeberl / Saahiti Penigalapati6-3, 6-2
W#1 SinglesBeth Lussenhop vs Kalpana Berman6-3, 4-6, 1-0
W#2 DoublesMichelle Cortez / Thao Nguyen vs Minnie Bautista / Janet Hummel6-2, 6-4
W#3 DoublesGreta Miracle / Kim Wallace vs Lori Farrell / Andrea Bailey6-4, 6-4
2024-02-19Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesJoanna Asia Wagner / Greta Miracle vs Karen Kraus / Teufelin Traylen5-7, 7-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBeth Lussenhop vs Quinn Hunt - (DQ)*6-0, 6-1
W#2 DoublesJessica Hutchins / Michelle Cortez vs Ilona Vondolovski / Dianna Kaady3-6, 6-2, 1-0
2024-02-09Split 2–2
W#1 DoublesJoanna Asia Wagner / Shannon Davis vs Sarah Sasek / Jennie Ehleringer7-5, 6-2
L#2 DoublesMichelle Cortez / Thao Nguyen vs Amy Marr / Monica Conners7-6, 6-4
L#2 SinglesBeth Lussenhop vs Kristin DuVal6-3, 6-0
W#3 DoublesGwen Kulak / Jessica Hutchins vs Anita Palodichuk / Georgia Greenblum6-7, 6-3, 1-0
2024-01-27Lost 1–2
L#1 DoublesValerie Neill / Joanna Asia Wagner vs Suki Birge / Diana Blebea4-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#2 DoublesGreta Miracle / Kim Wallace vs Melanie DeSilva / Theresa Hagerty6-4, 6-3
W#3 DoublesGwen Kulak / Jennifer Oh vs Cindy Bennett / Heidi Stutzman7-5, 6-2
2024-01-21Lost 0–3
L#1 DoublesKate Oliver / Beth Lussenhop vs Amelia Ryan / Amy Pickens6-1, 4-6, 1-0
L#2 DoublesValerie Neill / Gwen Kulak vs Sumi Kim / Teresa Zhao6-2, 6-2
L#2 SinglesThao Nguyen vs Puntrigar Suriyaseang - (DQ)*6-3, 6-4
2024-01-07Won 2–1
L#2 DoublesMichelle Cortez / Shannon Davis vs Karin Owens / Carol Glenn6-3, 7-6
W#2 SinglesBeth Lussenhop vs Kate Unterberger6-4, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJessica Hutchins / Thao Nguyen vs Victoria Cartwright / Karla Hendrickson6-4, 7-6
2023-12-08Lost 0–1
L#3 DoublesShannon Davis / Scott Tse vs Garret Glenn / Erin Mader6-3, 2-6, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits.

3
Greta Miracle
29W–25L career
0%43%57%
3.13
3
Thao Nguyen
34W–31L career
0%77%23%
3.02
3
Shannon Davis
44W–40L career
0%94%6%
2.88
3
Jennifer Oh
18W–14L career
0%96%4%
2.88
3
Valerie Neill
48W–76L career
0%96%3%
2.84
3
Beth Lussenhop
11W–16L career
1%98%1%
2.76
3
Gwen Kulak
18W–29L career
2%97%0%
2.73
3
Michelle Cortez
20W–25L career
11%88%0%
2.65

Three percentages are the year-end projection — chance of moving down, staying, moving up — and the number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.