Teams

SDNC 4.0 Slaying Bells @S&T/ Nguyen

2023 SoCal Fall Doubles- SDNC- WD (Holiday) · SDNC - Women 4.0 Tues

10 players · average NTRP 3.94 / SAN DIEGO

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
W#2 DoublesBonnie Haase / Shelly Donnelly vs Tobee Jackson / Connie Balen1-6, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCristiana De Rezende / Jihyun Kim vs Rindy Barnes / Stacey Dusseault2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Chang / KhanhLinh Nguyen vs Jennifer Bjornstad / Wendy Burgoon3-6, 6-3, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBonnie Haase / Shelly Donnelly vs Lynne Nero / Lori Price0-6, 1-6
W#3 DoublesPamela Sanford / Cristiana De Rezende vs Suzanne Hammer / Nancy Willis6-1, 6-3
L#2 DoublesAngela Chang / KhanhLinh Nguyen vs Kathy Williams / Jennifer Caringal4-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#3 DoublesBonnie Haase / Shelly Donnelly vs Joanne Florin / Robin Seay4-6, 4-6
L#2 DoublesAngela Chang / KhanhLinh Nguyen vs Deborah Fitzgerald / Rebecca Fritz5-7, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPamela Sanford / Shelly Donnelly vs Janene Christopher / Terri Bourne3-6, 5-7
L#3 DoublesCristiana De Rezende / Jihyun Kim vs Manda Moore / Gail Schwartz6-4, 0-6, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKhanhLinh Nguyen / Nan Kim vs Rosemary Mireles / Tracy Russo6-1, 6-2
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for SDNC - Women 4.0 Tues have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.71 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.35
Angela Chang
published 4.5
3.93
KhanhLinh Nguyen
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 4
3.81
Caryn Hall
published 4
Ellen Fales
published 4
3.71
HONG ZEMAN
published 4
3.69
Danielle Morales
published 4
3.65
Shelly Donnelly
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 4
3.27
Cristiana De Rezende
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.26
Bonnie Haase
published 3.5
Nan Kim
published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

4.5
Angela Chang
14W–7L career · no lines in 2023
<1%87%13%
4.35
4
KhanhLinh Nguyen
98W–42L career · 4 lines in 2023
<1%71%29%
3.93
4
Caryn Hall
7W–3L career · no lines in 2023
1%92%7%
3.81
4
Ellen Fales
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data
4
HONG ZEMAN
10W–5L career · no lines in 2023
5%94%1%
3.71
4
Danielle Morales
5W–4L career · no lines in 2023
7%92%1%
3.69
4
Shelly Donnelly
22W–51L career · 4 lines in 2023
12%88%<1%
3.65
3.5
Cristiana De Rezende
14W–20L career · 3 lines in 2023
2%94%4%
3.27
3.5
Bonnie Haase
2W–3L career · no lines in 2023
2%95%3%
3.26
Nan Kim
0W–2L career · no lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.