Teams

Kowalczyk, Rebecca

2023 Adult 40 & Over Daytime League 3.0 - 4.5 · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP / HEART OF AMERICA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2023-04-03vs Peddicord, KellyWon 31
L#1 DoublesTara Bennett / Karen Ramsden vs Jill Wineinger / Ronni Rosewicz2-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#1 SinglesLinda Shinn vs Robin Kistler6-4, 6-1
W#2 DoublesPamela ODonnell / Robin Ayers vs Christy Heller / Kari Lemons1-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#3 DoublesMarcy Earwood / Jane True vs Alison Borberg / Deborah Wiebrecht6-2, 6-3
2023-03-27vs Cowan, PamLost 13
L#1 DoublesPamela ODonnell / Patty Morton vs Kelly OConnor / Sherri Jackson4-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesLinda Shinn vs Teri Ramm6-4, 6-3
L#2 DoublesJane Slavik / Tara Bennett vs Pam Cowan / Brittany Rader2-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesLaura Thompson / Jane True vs Maryalice Williams / Paula Cartwright4-6, 6-7
2023-03-06vs Bennett, ConnieLost 13
L#1 DoublesMarcy Earwood / Rebecca Kowalczyk vs Stephanie Gunderson / Nancy Kitts1-6, 6-4, 0-1
L#1 SinglesSarah Andrews vs Angel Krishna1-6, 6-3, 0-1
W#2 DoublesKaren Ramsden / Jane Slavik vs Susan Murphy / Anne Miller7-6, 7-5
L#3 DoublesRobin Ayers / Jane True vs Debbie Kuegler / Ganga Perumparambil5-7, 3-5
2023-02-27vs Anthony, MichelleSplit 22
L#1 DoublesSarah Andrews / Laura Thompson vs Cara Lonergan / Kristi Hansen1-6, 6-2, 1-0
L#1 SinglesRebecca Kowalczyk vs Susan Schatz0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesKaren Ramsden / Tara Bennett vs Michelle Anthony / Polina Shaposhnyk2-6, 7-6, 1-0
W#3 DoublesPatty Morton / Linda Shinn vs Kelly Jackson / Joyce Widgren6-2, 6-4
2023-02-13vs Luchinsky, KarenLost 03
L#1 SinglesLinda Shinn vs Wendy Crowell6-1, 3-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesPamela ODonnell / Meta Cunningham vs Marti Huffman / Natasha Chappelle6-2, 0-6, 0-1
L#3 DoublesJane Slavik / Karen Ramsden vs Candace Bickford / Mary Sizoo4-6, 3-6
2023-02-06vs Lyon, ShannonSplit 22
W#1 DoublesMarcy Earwood / Robin Ayers vs Sheila Mccarrick / Jennifer Schreiber6-4, 7-5
L#1 SinglesRebecca Kowalczyk vs Stephanie Eilert1-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesSarah Andrews / Laura Thompson vs Brooke Chiaverini / Shannon Lyon6-4, 7-6
L#3 DoublesJane Slavik / Pamela ODonnell vs Samantha Green / Mallory Daniels4-6, 6-1, 0-1
2023-01-30vs Jensen, PattySplit 22
L#1 DoublesPatty Morton / Meta Cunningham vs Kathy Bazzell / Lisa Erickson6-2, 1-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesLinda Shinn vs Maria Hedrick1-6, 0-6
W#2 DoublesRobin Ayers / Karen Ramsden vs Eileen Hotze / Sonya Muller6-0, 6-2
W#3 DoublesJane Slavik / Laura Thompson vs Maryanne Loscalzo / Jane Olson7-5, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.12 estimated across 7 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.24
Pamela ODonnell
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
3.23
Sarah Andrews
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.21
Linda Shinn
usually #1 Singles 57%, also #3 Doubles 43% · published
3.16
Meta Cunningham
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #2 Doubles 50% · published
3.13
Patty Morton
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.99
Robin Ayers
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 25% · published
2.88
Jane True
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Jane Slavik
usually #3 Doubles 60%, also #2 Doubles 40% · published
Karen Ramsden
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published
Marcy Earwood
usually #1 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
Rebecca Kowalczyk
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Patty Morton + Linda Shinn14458% games+8.2% vs expected
Jane Slavik + Robin Ayers3547% games+6.6% vs expected
Jane Slavik + Karen Ramsden4450% games+6.0% vs expected
Sarah Andrews + Meta Cunningham6155% games+3.7% vs expected
Robin Ayers + Karen Ramsden4356% games+0.4% vs expected
Pamela ODonnell + Rebecca Kowalczyk5458% games−5.2% vs expected
Jane True + Karen Ramsden3352% games−11.4% vs expected
Pamela ODonnell + Jane Slavik1542% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Pamela ODonnell
21W–46L career · 4 lines in 2023
4%93%3%
3.24
Sarah Andrews
18W–15L career · 3 lines in 2023
5%92%3%
3.23
Linda Shinn
58W–64L career · 7 lines in 2023
6%92%2%
3.21
Meta Cunningham
22W–18L career · 2 lines in 2023
12%87%1%
3.16
Patty Morton
31W–44L career · 3 lines in 2023
18%82%<1%
3.13
Robin Ayers
30W–29L career · 4 lines in 2023
54%46%<1%
2.99
Jane True
24W–36L career · 3 lines in 2023
80%20%<1%
2.88
Jane Slavik
23W–26L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Karen Ramsden
35W–28L career · 5 lines in 2023
not enough data
Marcy Earwood
4W–3L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data
Rebecca Kowalczyk
31W–24L career · 3 lines in 2023
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.