Teams

Dekalb (Arvin Singh)*

USTA Atlanta Summer - 18 & Over Men - Regular · 4.5 Men

14 players · average NTRP 4.36 / GEORGIA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2025-06-29vs West Georgia TC (James Hughes)*Won 41
W#1 DoublesArvin Singh / Mark Davis vs Carlik Jones / Jacob Eastwood4-6, 6-2, 6-1
L#1 SinglesSherman Belton vs James Hughes5-7, 0-6
W#2 DoublesParker Jones / Griffin Kunkler vs Alexander Thomson / David Lee6-4, 7-6
W#2 SinglesNathaniel Weikert vs Deke Lloyd5-7, 6-1, 6-1
W#3 DoublesAndrew Rowles / Richard Sola vs Yuesheng Qu / Thomas Orschel6-3, 6-2
2025-06-22vs Piedmont Park (James Pressley)*Split 22
W#1 DoublesMatthew Moussouri / Daniel Freeman vs Emil Zakarian / Ethan Botts6-4, 6-2
L#1 SinglesAndrew Moehlich vs Mathieu Erramuzpe4-6, 6-7
W#2 SinglesMikhail Gosis vs Wilson Chira0-6, 6-1, 6-2
L#3 DoublesAndrew Brewer / Sherman Belton vs Scott Burton / John Knight1-6, 6-4, 4-6
2025-06-15vs Sandy Springs (Matt Hall)*Lost 23
L#1 DoublesParker Jones / Griffin Kunkler vs Andy McMaster / Scott Boehringer1-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesAndrew Moehlich vs Michael Lambert Jr1-6
L#2 DoublesRichard Sola / Andrew Rowles vs Asim Siddiqi / Logan Hull3-6, 0-6
W#2 SinglesDaniel Freeman vs Matthew Hall6-3, 6-3
W#3 DoublesArvin Singh / Brandon Smith vs Casey Molenaar / Joey Jezequel6-4, 7-5
2025-06-08vs Bitsy Grant (Tim Maldonado)*Won 32
W#1 DoublesAtman Mehta / Matthew Moussouri vs Michael Allen / Ramiro Urreta6-4, 6-3
W#1 SinglesDaniel Freeman vs Brian DeLuryea6-1, 6-1
L#2 DoublesParker Jones / Andrew Brewer vs John Nash / Pim Gebuis2-6, 2-6
L#2 SinglesSherman Belton vs Cullen McDonough2-6, 2-6
W#3 DoublesArvin Singh / Brandon Smith vs Tim Maldonado / Jody Chan6-2, 6-3
2025-06-01vs Piedmont Park (Gera Mats)*Lost 23
W#1 DoublesArvin Singh / Atman Mehta vs Kieran Coscia / Ryan Oliver6-1, 6-2
L#1 SinglesSherman Belton vs Michael Shahriari2-6, 5-7
L#2 DoublesParker Jones / Griffin Kunkler vs Kenneth Felts / Daniel Hall3-6, 6-3, 5-7
L#2 SinglesAndrew Brewer vs John DeRosa0-6, 0-6
W#3 DoublesBrandon Smith / Andrew Rowles vs Kenneth Costner / Will Bickelhaup6-4, 6-7, 6-3
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.
Flight standings13 teams · 4.5 Men
TeamWLInd. WInd. LSets lostGames lost
1Sandy Springs (Matt Hall)*6024617223
2USTA Atlanta/Donald Reilly6023718237
3Blackburn (Alex Miller)*5122823274
4Dekalb (Arvin Singh)*42191126244
5Bitsy Grant (Tim Maldonado)*42181227279
6West Georgia TC (James Hughes)*33171328285
7Havenstone (Aliu Sanni)*33161430278
8USTA Atlanta/Matthew Dreher33161433293
9Piedmont Park (Gera Mats)*33141637310
10Windermere (Avi Sistla)*24151530265
11Westbrook (Allen Armour)*24121839334
12Piedmont Park (James Pressley)*1592148347
13Fowler Park (Santosh Tirupari)*0612959374

Ordered by team wins, then losses, then sets lost — the order USTA uses to seed a flight. Individual wins are lines, not ties.

See the full flight, with every team’s record

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 4.17 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

4.43
Atman Mehta
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 5
4.42
Daniel Freeman
usually #2 Singles 33%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 4.5
4.38
Griffin Kunkler
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Doubles 33% · published
4.27
Arvin Singh
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 4.5
4.25
Matthew Moussouri
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Brandon Smith
published 4.5
4.11
Sherman Belton
usually #1 Singles 50%, also #2 Singles 25% · published
3.84
Andrew Rowles
usually #3 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 4
Andrew Moehlich
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 4
3.62
Andrew Brewer
usually #2 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 4
Mikhail Gosis
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Nathaniel Campanile
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
Nathaniel Weikert
usually #2 Singles 100% · published
Richard Sola
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #3 Doubles 50% · published
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

5
Atman Mehta
17W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
no projection at this level
4.43
4.5
Daniel Freeman
11W–2L career · type A · 3 lines in 2026
<1%71%29%
4.42
Griffin Kunkler
1W–2L career · 3 lines in 2026
<1%81%19%
4.38
4.5
Arvin Singh
27W–16L career · 4 lines in 2026
3%92%5%
4.27
Matthew Moussouri
8W–0L career · 2 lines in 2026
3%93%4%
4.25
4.5
Brandon Smith
12W–7L career · no lines in 2026
not enough data
Sherman Belton
0W–4L career · 4 lines in 2026
21%79%<1%
4.11
4
Andrew Rowles
2W–1L career · 3 lines in 2026
1%86%13%
3.84
4
Andrew Moehlich
0W–2L career · type S · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
4
Andrew Brewer
0W–3L career · 3 lines in 2026
20%80%<1%
3.62
Mikhail Gosis
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Nathaniel Campanile
4W–2L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data
Nathaniel Weikert
1W–0L career · 1 line in 2026
not enough data
Richard Sola
8W–3L career · 2 lines in 2026
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.