Teams

SChandler/NKoesel (Raintree)

2025 Adult 40 & Over League · 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women

13 players · average NTRP 3.07 / NORTH CAROLINA

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2025-04-29vs CLogar/RRiechelmann (WSRC)Won 20
W#1 DoublesLeigh Bellardini / Kelley Baughman vs Rhonda Tate / Martha Lowman6-1, 6-2
W#3 DoublesCiara McKiernan / Sarah Prochaska vs Beverly Russo / Mary Collins7-6, 6-3
2025-04-28vs TInga (Lifetime)Won 20
W#1 DoublesSusan Chandler / Niki Koesel vs JJ Zhu / Reshmi Santhosh6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesJulie Klingman / Elizabeth Harvey vs Xia Xia / Elana Blake6-2, 6-1
2025-04-15vs VTolson/KPetras (Firethorne)Won 31
W#1 DoublesNiki Koesel / Tricia Shaw vs Kim King / Kristen Petras6-0, 4-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesKimberlee Curley vs Jennifer Voci6-4, 7-5
L#2 DoublesJulie Klingman / Kelley Baughman vs Jennifer Pollino / Deb Sokol7-6, 1-6, 0-1
W#3 DoublesSusan Chandler / Ciara McKiernan vs Renu Renu Gill / Sheri Noot6-3, 6-2
2025-04-08vs VShannon (Raintree)Won 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Chandler / Ciara McKiernan vs Vicky Shannon / Margot Bizon6-1, 6-4
W#1 SinglesSuzanne MacVicar vs Kimberly Powell7-6, 6-3
W#2 DoublesLeigh Bellardini / Kelley Baughman vs Sara Shelor / Katherine Reeves7-6, 6-2
2025-04-01vs YSmith (Mason Wallace)Won 30
W#1 DoublesCiara McKiernan / Sarah Prochaska vs Kelly DiCristo / Yukiko Cooper6-4, 2-6, 1-0
W#1 SinglesSuzanne MacVicar vs Bridget Franks6-3, 6-2
W#2 DoublesLeigh Bellardini / Julie Klingman vs Kate MacRone / Bridget Megginson1-6, 6-3, 1-0
2025-03-25vs SHerndon/SStaley (WSRC)Won 21
L#1 SinglesKimberlee Curley vs Courtney Warner6-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesLeigh Bellardini / Kelley Baughman vs Tasha Cooper / Jurga Petrikis6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesElizabeth Harvey / Julie Klingman vs Kristyn Atkins / Tracy Lacroix7-6, 6-2
2025-03-18vs OBanchik/NO'Brien (Life Time)Won 21
L#1 DoublesNiki Koesel / Katie Eggers vs Madelaine LeBlanc / Felicia Ahn2-6, 3-6
W#1 SinglesKimberlee Curley vs Kimi Parker6-4, 6-7, 1-0
W#2 DoublesSusan Chandler / Suzanne MacVicar vs Tara Malone / Saima Barkat6-1, 6-3
2025-03-04vs MTurturro (OPRC)Won 30
W#1 DoublesSusan Chandler / Ciara McKiernan vs Jodi VonEschen / Punky Brick6-2, 6-2
W#1 SinglesKimberlee Curley vs Stacey Valitchka6-2, 6-0
W#2 DoublesLeigh Bellardini / Julie Klingman vs Eileen Jones / Mary Turturro7-5, 6-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 40 & Over Adult 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.88 estimated across 12 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.12
Katie Eggers
published
2.98
Christine Demille
published 3.5
2.96
Tricia Shaw
published
2.95
Leigh Bellardini
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #1 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.95
Niki Koesel
usually #1 Doubles 44%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.87
Susan Chandler
published
2.85
Julie Klingman
usually #2 Doubles 80%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3
2.84
Suzanne MacVicar
usually #1 Singles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published 3
2.82
Ciara McKiernan
usually #1 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published 3
2.81
Kimberlee Curley
usually #1 Singles 100% · published 3
2.76
Kelley Baughman
published
2.61
Elizabeth Laur
published
Sarah Prochaska
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Tricia Shaw + Katie Eggers4159% games+21.5% vs expected
Niki Koesel + Katie Eggers5260% games+16.0% vs expected
Julie Klingman + Leigh Bellardini4156% gamesnot enough data
Susan Chandler + Ciara McKiernan123 matchesnot enough data
Niki Koesel + Ciara McKiernan303 matchesnot enough data
Niki Koesel + Tricia Shaw213 matchesnot enough data
Ciara McKiernan + Leigh Bellardini123 matchesnot enough data
Julie Klingman + Suzanne MacVicar213 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Katie Eggers
12W–12L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
3.12
3.5
Christine Demille
1W–3L career · no lines in 2025
57%43%<1%
2.98
Tricia Shaw
17W–19L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.96
3
Leigh Bellardini
19W–8L career · 5 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
3
Niki Koesel
112W–67L career · 9 lines in 2025
<1%63%37%
2.95
Susan Chandler
9W–22L career · no lines in 2025
0%<1%>99%
2.87
3
Julie Klingman
39W–31L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%85%15%
2.85
3
Suzanne MacVicar
88W–100L career · 3 lines in 2025
1%87%13%
2.84
3
Ciara McKiernan
59W–47L career · 5 lines in 2025
1%89%9%
2.82
3
Kimberlee Curley
46W–67L career · 4 lines in 2025
1%90%9%
2.81
Kelley Baughman
3W–8L career · no lines in 2025
3%93%4%
2.76
Elizabeth Laur
2W–7L career · no lines in 2025
22%78%<1%
2.61
Sarah Prochaska
0W–1L career · no lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.