Teams

Perry/Knoxville

2024 Adult 40 & Over-Knoxville · 3.0 Women

15 players · average NTRP 2.83 / TENNESSEE

View scouting list →
Schedule5 played
2024-04-28vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesCynthia Muir / Catherine Perry vs Jenne MacCagli / Tara Osborne-Martz2-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesAnnabel Sims vs Karen Collins2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Greiner / Keri Brill vs Ginger Arthur / Maggie Reynolds2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesCatherine Shuman / Natalia Ward vs Delicia Arnold / Jen Rose2-6, 4-6
2024-04-21vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesLISA PETTY / Catherine Perry vs Wendi Arnold / Courtney Hammontree0-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesNatalia Ward vs Leigh Cowden1-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesAnnabel Sims / Mary Greiner vs Karen Collins / Debra Chaniott1-6, 0-6
L#3 DoublesMaria Willard / Catherine Shuman vs Olga Sokolov / Megan Haselschwerdt0-6, 3-6
L#4 DoublesKeri Brill / Martha Filipkowski vs Ginger Arthur / Delicia Arnold4-6, 2-6
2024-04-14vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 04
L#1 DoublesJana Dovgan / Amy Romano vs Angie Goodwyn / Wendi Arnold6-4, 1-6, 0-1
L#2 DoublesCatherine Perry / LISA PETTY vs Jen Rose / Paola Martinez2-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesCatherine Shuman / Deanne Michaelson vs Janis Crye / Tara Osborne-Martz1-6, 1-6
L#4 DoublesMelissa Theyken / Martha Filipkowski vs Jenne MacCagli / Linda Bui0-6, 2-6
2024-04-07vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 14
L#1 DoublesCatherine Perry / Mary Greiner vs Paola Martinez / Courtney Hammontree1-6, 1-6
L#1 SinglesAnnabel Sims vs Leigh Cowden6-7, 3-6
W#2 DoublesAmy Romano / Jana Dovgan vs Debra Chaniott / Linda Dayringer6-3, 1-6, 1-0
L#3 DoublesCatherine Shuman / Martha Filipkowski vs Olga Sokolov / Anessa Savici1-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesAshley Myers / Natalia Ward vs Jen Rose / Ginger Arthur2-6, 0-6
2024-03-24vs Huffman/KnoxvilleLost 05
L#1 DoublesCynthia Muir / Catherine Perry vs Jenne MacCagli / Linda Bui4-6, 2-6
L#1 SinglesLISA PETTY vs Angie Goodwyn2-6, 1-6
L#2 DoublesMary Greiner / Annabel Sims vs Tara Osborne-Martz / Maggie Reynolds3-6, 6-7
L#3 DoublesDeanne Michaelson / Melissa Theyken vs Linda Dayringer / Janis Crye4-6, 0-6
L#4 DoublesKeri Brill / Ashley Myers vs Anessa Savici / Olga Sokolov0-6, 0-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.0 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.43 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

2.81
Amy Romano
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published 3
Catherine Perry
usually #1 Doubles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3
Catherine Shuman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
2.65
Maria Willard
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published
2.63
Annabel Sims
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 50% · published 3
2.53
LISA PETTY
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
2.35
Jana Dovgan
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #1 Doubles 50% · published
2.33
Martha Filipkowski
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.33
Natalia Ward
usually #4 Doubles 33%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published
2.29
Keri Brill
usually #4 Doubles 67%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
Ashley Myers
usually #4 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
Deanne Michaelson
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 2.5
2.00
Melissa Theyken
usually #3 Doubles 50%, also #4 Doubles 50% · published
Cynthia Muir
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Mary Greiner
usually #2 Doubles 75%, also #1 Doubles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Maria Willard + Catherine Shuman314 matchesnot enough data
Keri Brill + Annabel Sims314 matchesnot enough data
Jana Dovgan + Amy Romano123 matchesnot enough data
Deanne Michaelson + Catherine Shuman123 matchesnot enough data
Keri Brill + Melissa Theyken123 matchesnot enough data
Keri Brill + Martha Filipkowski033 matchesnot enough data
Melissa Theyken + Natalia Ward123 matchesnot enough data
Martha Filipkowski + Catherine Shuman033 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3
Amy Romano
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
1%92%7%
2.81
3
Catherine Perry
0W–5L career · 5 lines in 2024
not enough data
3
Catherine Shuman
16W–11L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data
Maria Willard
11W–17L career · 1 line in 2024
13%87%<1%
2.65
3
Annabel Sims
32W–22L career · 4 lines in 2024
16%83%<1%
2.63
LISA PETTY
9W–24L career · 3 lines in 2024
42%58%<1%
2.53
Jana Dovgan
5W–13L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%87%13%
2.35
Martha Filipkowski
18W–31L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.33
Natalia Ward
12W–20L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%91%9%
2.33
Keri Brill
16W–27L career · 3 lines in 2024
0%95%5%
2.29
2.5
Ashley Myers
0W–8L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
2.5
Deanne Michaelson
4W–9L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Melissa Theyken
7W–18L career · 2 lines in 2024
0%>99%<1%
2.00
Cynthia Muir
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Greiner
4W–17L career · 4 lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.