Teams

RBW-Coe

2021 Adult 40 & Over · 3.5 Men

10 players · average NTRP 3.44 / NORTHWEST WASHINGTON

View scouting list →
Schedule8 played
2021-04-24vs CP-Wingmen-PaulsonWon 31
W#1 DoublesBrian Rayfield / Steve Lang vs Tony Balkan / Daniel Warren6-1, 6-1
L#1 SinglesChanadejh Sakchalathorn vs Howard Behr5-7, 6-7
W#2 DoublesHeng Liu / Ken Faith vs Thomas Lynch / Joe Morrow6-3, 6-2
W#3 DoublesChris Moore / Jewon Kim vs John Pope / John Flanagan6-2, 6-7, 1-0
2021-04-17vs EDG-DicksonWon 31
W#1 DoublesHeng Liu / Steve Lang vs Barry Strand / Brian Namba6-3, 7-6
W#1 SinglesBrian Rayfield vs Michael Nolan6-3, 6-4
W#2 DoublesKen Faith / Chris Moore vs Michael Hastings / Daniel Manning7-5, 7-6
L#3 DoublesNorman Cheuk / Jewon Kim vs Lee Schelley / Thomas Hansen3-6, 2-6
2021-04-02vs CAC/SL-BSers-SandquistWon 31
W#1 DoublesBret Arsenault / Tom Froslan vs Edward Hocker / Matthew Bohan6-4, 0-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesBrian Rayfield vs David Fischer1-6, 3-6
W#2 DoublesTerry Coe / Chanadejh Sakchalathorn vs John MacDonald / Doni Wanat7-6, 5-4
W#3 DoublesNorman Cheuk / Jewon Kim vs Phillip Sabin / Milan Stefanovic0-6, 7-6, 1-0
2021-03-27vs WSC-Freight Train-HummerSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBlake Bratt / Steve Lang vs Eric Botterbusch / John Monahan7-6, 3-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesChanadejh Sakchalathorn vs Frank Liu2-6, 4-6
W#2 DoublesTerry Coe / Tom Froslan vs Jonathan Hummer / Peter Sefton6-4, 7-5
W#3 DoublesKen Faith / Chris Moore vs Fred Chittenden / Ray Hisayasu7-6, 6-1
2021-03-26vs BC-2021 Camara 3.5Lost 13
L#1 DoublesBrian Rayfield / Blake Bratt vs Jeff Jones / Brian Fong5-7, 3-6
L#1 SinglesTom Froslan vs Michael LaMoria5-7, 1-6
W#2 DoublesKen Faith / Heng Liu vs Alex Camara / Matthew Scher5-7, 6-3, 1-0
L#3 DoublesBret Arsenault / Norman Cheuk vs Tom Clemente / Juan Vegarra6-4, 4-6, 0-1
2021-03-20vs IND-Argonauts-HerreraLost 12
W#1 DoublesBlake Bratt / Steve Lang vs Thai Tran / Eric DeMars6-3, 3-6, 1-0
L#1 SinglesJewon Kim vs Jason Herrera3-6, 0-6
L#2 DoublesKen Faith / Terry Coe vs Aaron Haffner / Thomas Sparks1-6, 7-6
2021-03-14vs RTC-String Theory-BurnsSplit 22
L#1 DoublesBrian Rayfield / Steve Lang vs Eric Cobb / Kurt Zumdieck4-6, 0-6
L#1 SinglesChanadejh Sakchalathorn vs Rowland Morgan1-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesTerry Coe / Heng Liu vs Joseph Mucci / Todd Dunnington6-0, 6-4
W#3 DoublesBlake Bratt / Chris Moore vs Kenneth Burns / Andy Rottler6-3, 7-5
2021-03-05vs TCSP-Sand Baggers-KelleySplit 22
W#1 DoublesBlake Bratt / Steve Lang vs Jonathan Borgida / Anthony Aguiluz6-4, 6-0
L#1 SinglesChanadejh Sakchalathorn vs Tyler Fuller0-6, 3-6
L#2 DoublesBret Arsenault / Brian Rayfield vs Dan Robinet / Alan Draper0-6, 7-5, 0-1
W#3 DoublesHeng Liu / Ken Faith vs Clinton Donough / Mike Merwin3-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Men have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.34 estimated across 8 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Steve Lang
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published 3.5
3.49
Chris Moore
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published 3.5
3.44
Tom Froslan
usually #1 Singles 33%, also #2 Doubles 33% · published
3.42
Heng Liu
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.38
Ken Faith
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #3 Doubles 33% · published 3.5
3.28
Chanadejh Sakchalathorn
usually #1 Singles 80%, also #2 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
Bret Arsenault
usually #2 Doubles 60%, also #3 Doubles 20% · published 3.5
3.19
Brian Rayfield
usually #1 Doubles 50%, also #1 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.00
Terry Coe
usually #2 Doubles 100% · published 3
Jewon Kim
usually #3 Doubles 75%, also #1 Singles 25% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Chanadejh Sakchalathorn + Brian Rayfield5069% games+16.7% vs expected
Heng Liu + Ken Faith9161% games+8.6% vs expected
Heng Liu + Steve Lang18463% games+7.2% vs expected
Steve Lang + Ken Faith7260% games−1.9% vs expected
Heng Liu + Terry Coe81249% games−5.3% vs expected
Bret Arsenault + Brian Rayfield2445% games−8.9% vs expected
Steve Lang + Terry Coe2355% gamesnot enough data
Ken Faith + Terry Coe1440% gamesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
Steve Lang
83W–29L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%32%68%
3.56
3.5
Chris Moore
90W–54L career · 4 lines in 2021
<1%53%47%
3.49
Tom Froslan
9W–5L career · 3 lines in 2021
69%31%<1%
3.44
3.5
Heng Liu
99W–48L career · 5 lines in 2021
<1%73%27%
3.42
3.5
Ken Faith
55W–25L career · 6 lines in 2021
<1%82%17%
3.38
3.5
Chanadejh Sakchalathorn
53W–32L career · 5 lines in 2021
2%94%4%
3.28
3.5
Bret Arsenault
44W–30L career · 5 lines in 2021
not enough data
3.5
Brian Rayfield
33W–32L career · 6 lines in 2021
7%92%1%
3.19
3
Terry Coe
69W–58L career · type A · 4 lines in 2021
<1%50%50%
3.00
Jewon Kim
12W–12L career · 4 lines in 2021
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.