Teams

Howard/Farrington 18+ S24

2024 ADULT 18 & OVER SUMMER · 3.5 Women

11 players · average NTRP 3.00 / NORTHERN

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
2024-07-22vs Hultman/Heltne S24 18+ 3.5Won 10
W#3 DoublesPam Howard / Jennifer Goedde vs Allison Jopke / Kathleen Hultman6-4, 6-2
2024-07-08vs Landrus 18+ S24Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPam Howard / Jennifer Goedde vs Keela Cottew / Linda Hauser4-6, 3-6
2024-06-24vs Johnson Summer 2024Lost 02
L#1 DoublesAnn Fort / Natalie Taylor vs Geri Gambucci / Diana Smigielski4-6, 4-6
L#3 DoublesPam Howard / Lori Powell-Knutson vs Emerson Chaloux / Riley Johnson6-3, 3-6, 0-1
2024-06-16vs Overdahl / Dymit SummerSplit 11
W#1 DoublesMary Beck / Natalie Taylor vs Kathy Cima / Shannon Overdahl5-7, 6-4, 1-0
L#2 DoublesPam Howard / Laura Peterson vs Sindhusha Kasinadhuni / Renee McCloden2-6, 3-6
2024-06-10vs Hultman/Heltne S24 18+ 3.5Lost 01
L#3 DoublesPam Howard / Heidi Kapacinskas vs Teri Heltne / Allison Jopke4-6, 2-6
2024-05-13vs Johnson Summer 2024Lost 01
L#3 DoublesJennifer Goedde / Pam Howard vs Victoria Maas / Bryana Klofstad1-6, 6-4, 0-1
2024-05-06vs Overdahl / Dymit SummerLost 01
L#2 DoublesPam Howard / Jennifer Goedde vs Sindhusha Kasinadhuni / Laurel Ward3-6, 3-6
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for 3.5 Women have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 3.07 estimated across 9 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.56
Natalie Taylor
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
3.38
Jennifer Goedde
published
3.18
Lori Powell-Knutson
published
3.09
Pam Howard
usually #3 Doubles 71%, also #2 Doubles 29% · published
3.08
Dunja Sher
published
3.05
Sherri Ruf
published
2.80
Laura Farrington
published
2.78
Yelena Yan
published
2.75
Ann Fort
published 3
Elizabeth Weiers
published
Heidi Kapacinskas
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Laura Farrington + Ann Fort113040% games+1.7% vs expected
Yelena Yan + Dunja Sher3448% games−0.4% vs expected
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Natalie Taylor
39W–28L career · 2 lines in 2024
33%67%<1%
3.56
Jennifer Goedde
8W–7L career · no lines in 2024
<1%81%19%
3.38
Lori Powell-Knutson
9W–14L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
3.18
Pam Howard
172W–113L career · 7 lines in 2024
<1%25%75%
3.09
Dunja Sher
13W–18L career · no lines in 2024
<1%29%71%
3.08
Sherri Ruf
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
36%64%<1%
3.05
Laura Farrington
11W–30L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Yelena Yan
14W–28L career · no lines in 2024
2%92%6%
2.78
3
Ann Fort
11W–30L career · no lines in 2024
4%93%3%
2.75
Elizabeth Weiers
1W–3L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Heidi Kapacinskas
0W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.