Teams

Enriquez/Burt (S)

2025 Adult 18 & Over Spring · Men 3.0

11 players · average NTRP 3.10 / ST. LOUIS

View scouting list →
Schedule7 played
W#1 DoublesLuke Bumgarner / Samuel Spencer vs Jason Martin / Nicholas Damato4-6, 6-4, 1-0
W#1 SinglesJames Slaughter vs Sundeep Jayaprabhu6-2, 6-4
W#2 DoublesJohn Burt / Gregory Enriquez vs John Litvin / Ronald Froman6-2, 6-4
L#3 DoublesFarid Roman / Jay Unnikrishnan vs Jerry Serio / Tom Rhoads2-6, 2-4
2025-04-06vs Duggan's RD (S)Won 32
W#1 DoublesLuke Bumgarner / Jay Unnikrishnan vs Luke Elias / Bill Etling6-0, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSachin Agarwalla vs Asim Hasanovic6-2, 6-3
L#2 DoublesGregory Enriquez / DWAYNE WILLIAMS vs James Trevor / Taojun Zou0-6, 2-6
W#2 SinglesJames Slaughter vs Samer Alkaade6-3, 6-1
L#3 DoublesDaniel Song / Farid Roman vs David Busker / Michael Drake2-6, 0-6
2025-03-30vs Lorance/Churchill (S)Lost 14
L#1 DoublesJohn Burt / Gregory Enriquez vs Spenser Lorance / Chad Wheeler6-4, 4-6, 0-1
L#1 SinglesJames Slaughter vs John Churchill6-7, 4-6
W#2 DoublesLuke Bumgarner / Samuel Spencer vs Ramesh Rajagopalan / Sanjay Khorana6-3, 6-2
L#2 SinglesDWAYNE WILLIAMS vs Matthew Obermeier4-6, 2-7
L#3 DoublesDaniel Song / Farid Roman vs Saahil Sheth / Jeff Pattison0-6, 4-6
2025-03-23vs Lorance/Churchill (S)Won 32
W#1 DoublesLuke Bumgarner / Samuel Spencer vs Ramesh Rajagopalan / Sanjay Khorana6-4, 6-1
W#1 SinglesSachin Agarwalla vs Chance Wong6-2, 7-6
L#2 DoublesJohn Burt / Gregory Enriquez vs Spenser Lorance / Chad Wheeler3-6, 3-6
W#2 SinglesJames Slaughter vs Matthew Obermeier6-2, 6-1
L#3 DoublesJay Unnikrishnan / Elias Ouerdani vs Jeff Pattison / Saahil Sheth6-3, 2-6, 0-1
L#1 DoublesLucas Signorelli / James Slaughter vs Charles Deal / Daniel Bogart4-6, 3-6
L#1 SinglesGregory Enriquez vs Angel Hristov0-6, 2-6
W#2 DoublesLuke Bumgarner / Jay Unnikrishnan vs Ulugbek Kamilov / Matthew Heller6-3, 6-3
L#3 DoublesJohn Burt / Elias Ouerdani vs Ryan Morgan / Rich Potje4-6, 3-6
2025-02-16vs Duggan's RD (S)Won 32
W#1 DoublesLucas Signorelli / James Slaughter vs Bill Etling / James Trevor6-0, 6-3
L#1 SinglesDWAYNE WILLIAMS vs Samer Alkaade1-6, 6-7
W#2 DoublesLuke Bumgarner / Jay Unnikrishnan vs Sung Min Ha / Taojun Zou6-2, 6-0
W#2 SinglesJohn Burt vs Jeffrey Traigle6-0, 5-7, 1-0
L#3 DoublesFarid Roman / Daniel Song vs Michael Drake / David Busker2-6, 0-6
2025-01-19vs Rudoplh/Krahulec (S)Lost 12
W#1 DoublesLuke Bumgarner / Samuel Spencer vs Thomas Bostick / Brian Augsburger6-4, 7-6
L#2 DoublesGregory Enriquez / John Burt vs John Quinn / Trey Shaffer2-6, 1-6
L#3 DoublesDWAYNE WILLIAMS / Farid Roman vs Alan Friedman / Christopher Sullivan2-6, 6-3, 1-0
A tie can be incomplete. Tell us if someone is missing.
i
Grouped by tie — one fixture, several lines. A line shows only when a player on it is someone we have indexed, so an early-season tie for a newly-added team can look short. This also means the line count here will not match the header, which counts individual player appearances.

Flight standings for Men 3.0 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.97 estimated across 2 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

James Slaughter
usually #1 Doubles 33%, also #2 Singles 33% · published 3.5
3.06
Sachin Agarwalla
usually #1 Singles 100% · published
2.89
Samuel Spencer
usually #1 Doubles 75%, also #2 Doubles 25% · published
DWAYNE WILLIAMS
usually #3 Doubles 25%, also #1 Singles 25% · published 3
Elias Ouerdani
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Farid Roman
usually #3 Doubles 100% · published 3
Gregory Enriquez
usually #2 Doubles 67%, also #1 Singles 17% · published 3
Jay Unnikrishnan
usually #2 Doubles 40%, also #3 Doubles 40% · published
John Burt
usually #2 Doubles 50%, also #2 Singles 17% · published
Lucas Signorelli
usually #1 Doubles 100% · published
Luke Bumgarner
usually #1 Doubles 57%, also #2 Doubles 43% · published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

John Burt + Gregory Enriquez7847% games+3.7% vs expected
John Burt + DWAYNE WILLIAMS1632% games−12.7% vs expected
Samuel Spencer + Luke Bumgarner404 matchesnot enough data
Gregory Enriquez + DWAYNE WILLIAMS044 matchesnot enough data
Luke Bumgarner + Jay Unnikrishnan303 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

3.5
James Slaughter
4W–2L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Sachin Agarwalla
7W–0L career · 2 lines in 2025
<1%33%67%
3.06
Samuel Spencer
9W–12L career · 4 lines in 2025
81%19%<1%
2.89
3
DWAYNE WILLIAMS
2W–25L career · 4 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Elias Ouerdani
0W–2L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Farid Roman
0W–9L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
3
Gregory Enriquez
8W–18L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Jay Unnikrishnan
3W–2L career · 5 lines in 2025
not enough data
John Burt
15W–41L career · 6 lines in 2025
not enough data
Lucas Signorelli
1W–1L career · 2 lines in 2025
not enough data
Luke Bumgarner
7W–0L career · 7 lines in 2025
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.