Teams

GSTL40/Brady/Dunes

2024 Combo 40 & Over- GSTL · Adult WOMEN - 6.5

20 players · average NTRP 3.20 / SOUTH CAROLINA

No matches recorded for this roster in this league — it may be a placeholder registration, or the season may not have started.

View scouting list →

Flight standings for Adult WOMEN - 6.5 have not been collected yet. Where we have them we show every team in the flight ranked, with this team highlighted. The crawler is still filling in older seasons and flights.

ScoutingWhere each opponent usually plays

Signed-in extra: whether this captain plays strict strength order or mixes it up, from every doubles line they have put out. Create a free account to see it.

Roster averages 2.82 estimated across 17 rated players. No lineup is published in advance, so the column below is where each player has actually been used — a captain's habits are the best available forecast. Sign in and claim your record to see who you have played.

3.13
Shai Kahn
published
3.13
Katie Sandoz
published
3.12
Deborah Conner
published 3.5
3.08
Amanda Hadstate
published 3.5
2.91
Pender Epstein
published
2.88
Mary Stokes
published
2.86
Susan Brady
published
2.84
Sonya Martin
published
2.80
Pamela Yates
published
2.72
Patty Gresko
published
2.72
Georgeanne Rice
published
2.68
2.65
Debbie Edmonds
published 3
2.65
Margaret Singleton
published
2.63
Donna Zeglin
published
2.62
Jeri Himmelsbach
published
2.60
Cheryl Young
published 3
Joycelyn Gallois
published
Lori Queener
published
Mary Margaret Hyatt
published
Established pairs

Doubles pairs from this roster with three or more matches together anywhere — ordered by performance against what the rating gap predicted, not by record.

Georgeanne Rice + Debbie Edmonds3347% games+9.2% vs expected
Susan Brady + Amanda Hadstate8256% games+7.6% vs expected
Katie Sandoz + Shai Kahn4548% games−2.8% vs expected
Jeri Himmelsbach + Donna Zeglin3448% games−5.9% vs expected
Pender Epstein + Katie Sandoz224 matchesnot enough data
Sonya Martin + Deborah Conner123 matchesnot enough data
Sonya Martin + Mary Margaret Hyatt213 matchesnot enough data
Shai Kahn + Susan Brady123 matchesnot enough data
Roster

Ordered by our estimated dynamic rating, which is why two players at the same published level are not tied — a published 4.0 says nothing about where inside the band someone sits. Lines played in this team’s season are shown beside each name.

Shai Kahn
21W–33L career · no lines in 2024
<1%17%83%
3.13
Katie Sandoz
41W–41L career · no lines in 2024
<1%19%81%
3.13
3.5
Deborah Conner
4W–10L career · no lines in 2024
20%80%<1%
3.12
3.5
Amanda Hadstate
22W–25L career · no lines in 2024
28%71%<1%
3.08
Pender Epstein
4W–9L career · no lines in 2024
74%26%<1%
2.91
Mary Stokes
3W–11L career · no lines in 2024
80%20%<1%
2.88
Susan Brady
26W–24L career · no lines in 2024
<1%83%16%
2.86
Sonya Martin
4W–16L career · no lines in 2024
87%13%<1%
2.84
Pamela Yates
13W–25L career · no lines in 2024
2%91%8%
2.80
Patty Gresko
9W–13L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
Georgeanne Rice
9W–5L career · no lines in 2024
6%92%2%
2.72
3
Catherine Collins
4W–3L career · no lines in 2024
10%89%1%
2.68
3
Debbie Edmonds
6W–15L career · no lines in 2024
14%85%1%
2.65
Margaret Singleton
6W–6L career · no lines in 2024
15%84%1%
2.65
Donna Zeglin
7W–12L career · no lines in 2024
18%81%<1%
2.63
Jeri Himmelsbach
6W–8L career · no lines in 2024
19%80%<1%
2.62
3
Cheryl Young
10W–22L career · no lines in 2024
23%77%<1%
2.60
Joycelyn Gallois
1W–2L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Lori Queener
0W–4L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data
Mary Margaret Hyatt
3W–6L career · no lines in 2024
not enough data

Three percentages are where each player stands right now: the chance they are below their band, inside it, or above it, on the way they are playing this season. The number on the right is our estimated dynamic rating, which USTA never publishes. This is today rather than a forecast of December, because a forecast has to assume future matches and cannot know whether someone will even be offered them. Percentages are blank where a player has too few matches this season, or at a level where the model does not yet beat a base-rate guess; the estimate is a weaker claim than a probability and survives where those do not.

Not affiliated with or endorsed by the USTA. Ratings labelled as published are USTA year-end figures; anything we describe as an estimate is ours, not USTA’s. Match data is from USTA TennisLink.